2003
DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00734.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria

Abstract: Since the new ABET accreditation system was first introduced to American engineering education in the middle 1990s as Engineering Criteria 2000, most discussion in the literature has focused on how to assess Outcomes 3a-3k and relatively little has concerned how to equip students with the skills and attitudes specified in those outcomes. This paper seeks to fill this gap. Its goals are to (1) overview the accreditation process and clarify the confusing array of terms associated with it (objectives, outcomes, o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
428
0
12

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 621 publications
(474 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
428
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…They do so according to frameworks for joint quality standards for curricula in higher education. Examples are the American system of ABET criteria for engineering curricula (Felder and Brent, 2003;Felder et al, 2011;Shuman et al, 2005), the Australian generic 'graduate attibutes' (Byrne et al, 2010;Desha et al, 2009) Hence, coping with changing curricula should account for the hidden, institutional side especially in the global field of sustainable education (Rikers et al, 2011). By indicating the main obstacles, this study explains how one could cope with these conditions in the implementation process of the new curricula design.…”
Section: Professional Demands and Learning Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They do so according to frameworks for joint quality standards for curricula in higher education. Examples are the American system of ABET criteria for engineering curricula (Felder and Brent, 2003;Felder et al, 2011;Shuman et al, 2005), the Australian generic 'graduate attibutes' (Byrne et al, 2010;Desha et al, 2009) Hence, coping with changing curricula should account for the hidden, institutional side especially in the global field of sustainable education (Rikers et al, 2011). By indicating the main obstacles, this study explains how one could cope with these conditions in the implementation process of the new curricula design.…”
Section: Professional Demands and Learning Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spirit of student-centered learning is also fully reflected in the Engineering Criteria of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), whose the approach focuses on learning outcome not on teaching input [13]. Also the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), just to refer a few give emphasis to the need to move towards a learner-centred, and technology enhanced learning approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective of senior design courses in engineering and engineering technology curricula is to bridge the gap between academic theory and real world practice. As discussed in the ABET criteria [8] senior capstone projects should include elements of both credible analysis and experimental proofing.…”
Section: Synopsis Of Senior Design Capstone Coursesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To fill in the gap between the industry demand of specialized job skills and the current educational majors offered in the Greater Philadelphia and surroundings local colleges and universities, our Drexel University, Engineering Technology (ET) program offers a combined electrical and mechanical engineering technology major, with several courses related to renewable energy, energy conversion, green energy manufacturing and sustainability. Our main goal is to create a highly skilled professional workforce ready to "hit the ground running" after graduation and also having most of the qualities of a "global engineer", a critical thinker and an innovator which is in total agreement with ABET criterion c ("an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability") [7], [8]. During the past 8 years, our ET program developed courses oriented towards energy conversion and green energy and sustainability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%