2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0163-8343(00)00059-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing and implementing a primary care intervention trial to improve the quality and outcome of care for major depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
79
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods used in QuEST 45,[51][52][53][54] and MHAP 53,55 have been described previously and are summarized here. Both projects used a 4-level nested design, recruiting community-based health care programs, primary care practices within program, primary care clinicians within practice, and patients with depression within clinician.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods used in QuEST 45,[51][52][53][54] and MHAP 53,55 have been described previously and are summarized here. Both projects used a 4-level nested design, recruiting community-based health care programs, primary care practices within program, primary care clinicians within practice, and patients with depression within clinician.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, whereas the results of the trials suggest that providing collaborative care to patients with depression is better than not providing such care, they do not address whether screening would benefit patients with previously unrecognized depression. Underlining this point, among the three largest studies cited by the task force (studies involving > 100 patients), 44% of patients in one trial were given treatment for depression before their enrolment, 21 and 44% of patients in another of the studies were receiving appropriate care for depression, defined as specialized counselling or treatment using antidepressant medication, before their enrolment;…”
Section: Recommendation Of the Us Preventive Services Task Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of substantive findings, clients had a high prevalence of depression, 33 % overall and 35 % in primary care/public health settings with even higher prevalence in other screening locations; by comparison, depression rates in primary care are typically 6-20 %. 7,40,[48][49][50] Thus, clients in safety net populations within under-resourced communities have a high burden of depression meriting evaluation. The clients were primarily African American or Latino and most were uninsured, met federal poverty criteria, or were not employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies of quality improvement in specific sites or applying CBPR to health rely on convenience samples, 7,38,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61] and use integrated systems or households or settings in government districts. 39,49,[62][63][64][65][66] The study findings are based on client self-report and may not accurately reflect actual service use due to problems such as client recall. In addition, our findings are limited to financially stable, community-based safety-net programs in Los Angeles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%