Designing an exploratory visual interface to the results of citizen surveys

Abstract

This is the unspecified version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Surveys are used by public authorities to monitor the quality and reach of public services and provide information needed to help improve them. The results of such surveys tend to be used in internal reports, with highly-aggregated summaries being released to the public. Even where data are released, many citizens do not have the capability to explore and interpret them. This offers limited scope for citizens to explore the results and use them to help hold service providers to account -objectives that are increasingly important in public service provision. We work closely with an English local authority to develop an innovative interactive interface to a citizen survey to demonstrate what can be achieved by applying a visual approach to the exploration of such data. In so doing we (a) make a case for web-based interactive visualisation to make this kind of information accessible both internally to those working in local government and externally to citizens in a way that is not achieved through a regular Open Data release or existing applications; (b) use techniques from both cartography and information visualization to inform the design of fluid visual interactions that enable diverse users -from the casual citizen browser to those interested in more in-depth analysis -to view, compare and interpret the survey outputs from a wide variety of perspectives; and (c) document experiences and reactions to the provision of information in this form, with log analysis playing a role in this exercise. Our reflections on our successes and otherwise will inform future exploratory interface design to help citizens access information and hold public service providers to account. Permanent repository link

Providing Public Servants What They Need: Revealing the “Unseen” through Data Visualization

“…With engagement, understanding is enhanced (Card, Mackinlay, and Schneiderman ; Spence ; Tufte ). However, it is unclear what level of complexity and sophistication is suitable for general use and what is the level beyond which understanding is no longer augmented (Slingsby et al ). Rather than pure interactivity, a balance between telling a story and some interactivity to customize the presentation to users' needs is likely to be necessary for effectiveness (Segel and Heer ).…”

“…The visualization was intended to provide a place for individuals to tell their stories by annotating the data. In the second, Slingsby et al () created a visualization tool that was intended for use by both internal and external local government actors based on data collected in a local citizen survey. In both studies, the public failed to be activated to use the tools beyond minimal engagement.…”

Breaking the Eyes: How Do Users Get Started with a Coordinated and Multiple View Geovisualization Tool?

“…Once the user has understood the basic functions, the interface gradually enables more complex functions. Slingsby et al (2014) successfully applied this kind of progressing tutorial, relating to playful design in gaming (Ferrara, 2012), where players are guided by tutorial versions of a game that gradually increase in complexity. However, there is a risk that a user never 'discovers' more advanced levels and never gets to know that some features are implemented into an application.…”

An Evaluation of Interactive Map Comparison Techniques

“…The overall goal is to generate representations that best answer a given user demand. GI science is also increasingly investigating interactive cartography (see, e.g., [31,32] for representative examples). User studies in GI science tend to rely on realistic experimental tasks and to yield mostly qualitative measures.…”