2021
DOI: 10.1109/taffc.2019.2905561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing an Experience Sampling Method for Smartphone Based Emotion Detection

Abstract: Smartphones provide the capability to perform in-situ sampling of human behavior using Experience Sampling Method (ESM). Designing an ESM schedule involves probing the user repeatedly at suitable moments to collect self-reports. Timely probe generation to collect high fidelity user responses while keeping probing rate low is challenging. In mobile-based ESM, timeliness of the probe is also impacted by user's availability to respond to self-report request. Thus, a good ESM design must consider -probing frequenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Limitations of our study are associated with those of the contributions. With respect to the list of requirements, even though requirements were elicited via interviews, iterative design, and empirical evaluation, some requirements might be left out, in particular due to the lack of case studies that demand supporting relationships among participants (FR10) or that employ home sensors, wearable devices, and JITAIs along with machine learning-based triggers [68,69]. These limitations are reflected in the 4-dimension planning framework, in the sensor dimension which might be more detailed to support such scenarios that demand, for instance, human activity recognition [70].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations of our study are associated with those of the contributions. With respect to the list of requirements, even though requirements were elicited via interviews, iterative design, and empirical evaluation, some requirements might be left out, in particular due to the lack of case studies that demand supporting relationships among participants (FR10) or that employ home sensors, wearable devices, and JITAIs along with machine learning-based triggers [68,69]. These limitations are reflected in the 4-dimension planning framework, in the sensor dimension which might be more detailed to support such scenarios that demand, for instance, human activity recognition [70].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the events between two successive surveys are labelled with the input provided by the user. In their further study presented in [91], the authors also trained a machine learning model to detect the inopportune moments for self-reports. To get the examples of inopportune moments necessary to train the model, information from reports was used, as it allowed the users to select a NoResponse option.…”
Section: Data Labellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the user completes text entry in a session and changes the application, she is probed to record her perceived emotion during this session. We issue the emotion self-report collection probes using Experience Sampling Method (ESM) [21]- [23]. Finally, the user provided emotion self-reports are used as the ground truth labels for the associated sessions.…”
Section: A Data Collection Processmentioning
confidence: 99%