2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing a graph-based approach to landscape ecological assessment of linear infrastructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are strong interactions between landscape covariates and connectivity. This finding is consistent with other studies related to landscape connectivity analysis (Foltête et al 2012b;Girardet et al 2013;Clauzel et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…There are strong interactions between landscape covariates and connectivity. This finding is consistent with other studies related to landscape connectivity analysis (Foltête et al 2012b;Girardet et al 2013;Clauzel et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…From this perspective, graph-based methods are interesting because they include both structural and functional aspects of connectivity. Our results are consistent with several previous studies that highlighted the importance of integrating the barrier effect in addition to the direct loss of habitat in environmental impact assessment Forman and Alexander 1998;Fu et al 2010;Girardet et al 2013;Liu et al 2014). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Several metrics can be computed at global level to assess connectivity for the entire graph or at local level for individual nodes or links (Galpern et al 2011). Graph-based studies have been used to identify the key elements for connectivity (Bodin and Saura 2010;Saura and Pascual-Hortal 2007), to evaluate the importance of connectivity for species distribution (Foltête et al 2012a;Galpern and Manseau 2013;Lookingbill et al 2010), to assess the impact assessment of a given development on connectivity Fu et al 2010;Girardet et al 2013;Gurrutxaga et al 2011;Liu et al 2014) or to propose mitigation measures for improving connectivity (Clauzel et al 2015a, b;Girardet et al 2016;Mimet et al 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this perspective, graphbased methods are interesting because they include both structural (arrangement of habitat patches) and functional (behavior of the organisms) aspects of connectivity (Dale and Fortin, 2010;Urban et al, 2009). These results are consistent with several previous studies that highlighted the importance of integrating the barrier effect in addition to the direct loss of habitat in environmental impact assessment Forman and Alexander, 1998;Fu et al, 2010;Girardet et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Impact Assessment Of Prospective Scenarios On Connectivitysupporting
confidence: 91%