2009 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium 2009
DOI: 10.1109/aps.2009.5172133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing a 32 element array at 76GHz with a 33dB taylor distribution in waveguide for a radar system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the use of such power distribution components is associated with degraded reflection responses of the feeds, stronger coupling effects, increased sensitivity of the entire antenna-feed structure to manufacturing tolerances, as well as degraded radiation pattern of the array [3,4], in particular, due to non-decoupling of the outputs and increased reflection (from the higher-impedance output) [8]. CFs realising predefined non-uniform amplitude excitations of certain linear antenna arrays have been demonstrated for microstrip/stripline [3,9] and waveguide [10] technologies; however, the choice and optimality of the implemented CF architectures was not clarified. At the same time, an importance of full-wave electromagnetic (EM) simulations for tuning and validation has been demonstrated [3,[9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of such power distribution components is associated with degraded reflection responses of the feeds, stronger coupling effects, increased sensitivity of the entire antenna-feed structure to manufacturing tolerances, as well as degraded radiation pattern of the array [3,4], in particular, due to non-decoupling of the outputs and increased reflection (from the higher-impedance output) [8]. CFs realising predefined non-uniform amplitude excitations of certain linear antenna arrays have been demonstrated for microstrip/stripline [3,9] and waveguide [10] technologies; however, the choice and optimality of the implemented CF architectures was not clarified. At the same time, an importance of full-wave electromagnetic (EM) simulations for tuning and validation has been demonstrated [3,[9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2nd and 3rd stages are composed of unequal T-junction power splitters to achieve the required aperture distribution. The latter are combined with H-plane bends that are used to compensate different delays generated by the imbalanced power splitting [32]. The last stage divides the power evenly through the Y-junction splitters.…”
Section: A 16-way Power Dividermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The receive antenna array is composed of 32-elements fed with a waveguide power divider designed to produce a 33dB Taylor distribution across the array aperture [2], [3]. The overall configuration is shown in Figure 2, and measures 0.5" (height) X 7.0" (width) X 5.0" (depth).…”
Section: Figure 1 Block Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, however, does not compromise the side-lobe requirement within the operating scanning range of + 15 degrees that is needed for the collision avoidance system. Detailed analysis and HFSS simulations of the design and power divider matching are included in [2] and [3] with the fabrication, measurements and characterization of the antenna. The antenna design shown in Figure 2 was fabricated as a fully integrated horn array and 5-stage power divider.…”
Section: Figure 1 Block Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%