2014 Second RSI/ISM International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICRoM) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icrom.2014.6990910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing a 2-DOF passive mechanism for dynamical calibration of MEMS-based motion sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the tests carried out with synthetic data give a valid indication of the potential accuracy of this method, the suitability of the proposed model for the calibration of a real accelerometer can be only verified by performing real experiments on that sensor. The most popular calibration methods in literature assess their accuracy by comparing the fitness of the sensor output to a known model, like the closeness of the absolute value to g in static conditions, as in [4], [5], [10]- [12], or the fitness to other known model constraints, as in [2], [3], [13], before and after the calibration. This approach only proves that the calibrated acceleration signal is more accurate than the uncalibrated output, but no information is provided about the actual precision of the estimated calibration parameters.…”
Section: B Performance Evaluation On a Real Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the tests carried out with synthetic data give a valid indication of the potential accuracy of this method, the suitability of the proposed model for the calibration of a real accelerometer can be only verified by performing real experiments on that sensor. The most popular calibration methods in literature assess their accuracy by comparing the fitness of the sensor output to a known model, like the closeness of the absolute value to g in static conditions, as in [4], [5], [10]- [12], or the fitness to other known model constraints, as in [2], [3], [13], before and after the calibration. This approach only proves that the calibrated acceleration signal is more accurate than the uncalibrated output, but no information is provided about the actual precision of the estimated calibration parameters.…”
Section: B Performance Evaluation On a Real Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different approaches have been proposed in literature for the calibration of triaxial accelerometer [2], [4]- [13], featuring a large variety of calibration setups and sensor models. In general, more sophisticated calibration approaches are able to estimate more complex accelerometer models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [ 27 ], a two-degree-of-freedom (DOF) mechatronic structure is proposed to generate controlled linear and angular accelerations in the sensor. The structure includes shaft encoders and a microcontroller unit to obtain its position when in motion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%