Designer Drugs

Fu, Shanlin; Stojanovska, Natasha

doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-382165-2.00078-7

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At present, they include several different classes of drugs of abuse, e.g., cannabimimetics, fentanyls, piperidines, tryptamine derivatives and the groups of phenethylamines [1,2]. These substances are chemically developed from the base structures of known compounds, exploring all possible substitutions to retain the pharmacological effects of the original drugs and at the same time to circumvent the existing laws and their disclosure [3][4][5][6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Metabolic profile of the synthetic drug 4,4′-dimethylaminorex in urine by LC–MS-based techniques: selection of the most suitable markers of its intake

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose In this study, the phase I and II metabolic pathways of 4,4′-dimethylaminorex were characterized to select the marker(s) of intake allowing the unequivocal identification of this novel psychoactive substance in urine samples. Methods The metabolic profile of 4,4′-dimethylaminorex was characterized using both in vitro and in vivo models. In detail, for the in vitro experiments, either pooled human liver microsomes or recombinant cytochrome P450 isoforms were selected, whereas the in vivo investigation was performed on male mice ICR (CD-1®). Sample preparation included enzymatic hydrolysis followed by liquid/liquid extraction. The instrumental analysis was performed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to either high- or low-resolution tandem mass spectrometry. Results Five metabolic products were isolated only for the cis-isomer: the phase I metabolic reactions included hydrolysis, carboxylation, hydroxylation, and carbonylation. CYP2D6 was the principal isoenzyme involved, and the incubation in the presence of different allelic variants showed significant alteration on the metabolic profile. Once formed, the phase I metabolites underwent extensive conjugation. Not only the most abundant compounds detected, but also those with the most extended window of detection, were the carboxylated and the hydroxylated metabolites. These analytes together with the parent compound were selected as the most suitable markers of intake. Conclusions Knowledge of the metabolic profiles of the new drugs is essential for their fast identification. Phase I and phase II metabolites of 4,4′-dimethylaminorex were identified and selected as markers of intake, to be considered as the most suitable analytical targets in forensic toxicology.

show abstract