2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40846-021-00633-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Workflow for Mandibular Reconstruction. Opportunities and Limitations of In-house Virtual Surgical Planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is a lack of description of design digital chains for these guides. Maxillofacial reconstruction seems to be the most prominent field for developing SCG design workflows ( Numajiri et al, 2018 ; Ostas et al, 2021 ), but it remains rare. To the best of our knowledge, such workflows do not exist for pelvic applications in the literature, especially for tumor resection surgeries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a lack of description of design digital chains for these guides. Maxillofacial reconstruction seems to be the most prominent field for developing SCG design workflows ( Numajiri et al, 2018 ; Ostas et al, 2021 ), but it remains rare. To the best of our knowledge, such workflows do not exist for pelvic applications in the literature, especially for tumor resection surgeries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the measurement points were placed on the plates, and the distances between the two surfaces were measured. The software computed, from every point of the polygon on the backside of the plates, the vertical distance to the surface of the mandible (GOM Inspect V8 software) [31]. The measurement result of each testing was automatically saved in an Excel sheet.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Accuracy Of The Platementioning
confidence: 99%