2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2010.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design verification and validation in product lifecycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
108
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 174 publications
(212 reference statements)
1
108
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We found some of the practices to be isolated from the engineering design community, suggesting that greater integration between design and measurement could yield long-term benefits. Hence we agree with the viewpoint of Maropoulos and Ceglarek [26] by suggesting that PLM could improve the line of sight between product definition and measurement capability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found some of the practices to be isolated from the engineering design community, suggesting that greater integration between design and measurement could yield long-term benefits. Hence we agree with the viewpoint of Maropoulos and Ceglarek [26] by suggesting that PLM could improve the line of sight between product definition and measurement capability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Design optimisation is centred on a product lifecycle management (PLM) system, and there is a trend towards integrating an increasing number of processes through such systems [25]. Specifically, it has been argued that PLM is currently under-used with regard to measurement processes; Maropoulos and Ceglarek [26] concluded an extensive review on design verification and validation by noting that PLM has the potential to improve the line of sight between product definition and measurement capability, thereby enabling designs to be verified earlier in the lifecycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, over the past decades, advancements in computer technology enabled establishing increasingly sophisticated virtual models of physical artefacts as well as the fusion of such models for systems engineering [6]. These models not only serve for the design verification and validation [7], but are also increasingly used as the master product model comprising the model-based definition of required product characteristics [8]. Moreover, the evolvements in "microchip, sensor and IT technologies" [9] paved the way for the advent of smart products, which track and communicate their operating conditions and thus allow to "feed" their product models with data about their status, such as environmental conditions and loads.…”
Section: The Origin and Evolution Of The Digital Twinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The business benefits of integrating life cycle considerations and transitioning from a single product to a product service system perspective have also been discussed [6][7][8]. As for the operational part there is an increasing number of publications linking LCA to product development and management processes and coupling environmental assessments with intelligence systems for effective product life cycle management and decision support towards sustainability [9][10][11][12][13]. However, to invest and effectively uptake tools and services that support LCA integration to daily operations, the business case needs to be proved to the decision makers.…”
Section: Life Cycle Thinking In Wind Power Technology Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%