2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.08.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design, synthesis and evaluation of monovalent ligands for the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGP-R)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3D). This value is somewhat lower than that obtained recently from SPR experiments [20], with the difference probably due to the effects of immobilization of ASGP-R CRD on the SPR sensor chips. We also determined the dissociation constants for Gal binding to ASGP-R CRD at various Ca 2+ concentrations.…”
Section: Ligand Binding To Asgp-r Crdcontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…3D). This value is somewhat lower than that obtained recently from SPR experiments [20], with the difference probably due to the effects of immobilization of ASGP-R CRD on the SPR sensor chips. We also determined the dissociation constants for Gal binding to ASGP-R CRD at various Ca 2+ concentrations.…”
Section: Ligand Binding To Asgp-r Crdcontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Stokmaier et al revealed that the binding affinity of galactose to ASGPR elevated 100–1000 fold from mono- to triantennary galactose structures, probably due to clustering effects [22]. The dissociation constant of monosaccharide with ASGPR was 10 –4 M, whereas those of triantennary and tetraantennary compounds with ASGPR were 5 × 10 −9 M and 9 × 10 −9 M, respectively [22]. Previously, we synthesized the mono-Lac-β-CD and revealed the reduction in accumulation of intracellular cholesterol in NPC-like HepG2 cells [14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements were performed by using flow cytometry in HepG2 cells. [a] Dissociation constant for the binding of the labeled glycoconjugates with the human ASGPR, calculated by using a simple competitive inhibition model with the IC 50 value measured with GalNAc and the inhibition constant with GalNAc ( K i =150×10 −6 ) . [b] Incomplete saturation or inhibition at the concentration range used.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%