1976
DOI: 10.2514/3.58726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Study of Structural Concepts for an Arrow-Wing Supersonic Cruise Aircraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this limitation is twofold: It is believed that this configuration will be applied for many decades, and even for alternative configurations, such as blended wings [7][8][9][10] and high speed aircraft [11,12], many structural and material aspects discussed for the conventional configuration will remain applicable.…”
Section: Structural Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this limitation is twofold: It is believed that this configuration will be applied for many decades, and even for alternative configurations, such as blended wings [7][8][9][10] and high speed aircraft [11,12], many structural and material aspects discussed for the conventional configuration will remain applicable.…”
Section: Structural Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it involved the acquisition/development of a body of manufacturing knowledge. This was based on several previous supersonic transport studies, [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] as well as studies of candidate materials and processes to be used for the HSCT. 24,[29][30][31][32] The most relevant knowledge was embodied in a Knowledge-Based System, CLIPS, 33 (C Language Integrated Production System) which was used for this research.…”
Section: Implementation Of Design Justificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lockheed SST concept carried 234 passengers, had a cruise Mach of 2.7, and a baseline wing area of 10,900 square feet. The SST studies [18][19][20][21][22] resulted in a large amount of published data. Much information exists in the reports from the various disciplines, including performance and weights.…”
Section: Summary Of the Lockheed Sst Evaluation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collier et al (2010) also suggested that Hat stiffened panels were the most efficient for carrying axial compressive loads, being up to 20 % lighter than sandwich based alternatives. Hence, both Collier et al (2010) and Sakata and Davis (1977) came to a similar conclusion regarding the optimal stringer geometry, despite having different vehicles being analysed. This suggested that Hat based stringers may also be the most efficient stringer stiffening cross section for the SPARTAN third stage aeroshell.…”
Section: Design and Optimisation Of Stringer Stiffened Structuresmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…According to work by Sakata and Davis (1977) on the structural design of a supersonic cruise aircraft fuselage, Zee and Hat stringer profiles were found to offer the maximum mass savings.…”
Section: Design and Optimisation Of Stringer Stiffened Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%