1990
DOI: 10.13182/fst90-a29179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Study for the Large Helical Device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
118
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculations in figure (1) are performed for the r/a = 0.5 surface of the LHD stellarator [41] in its standard configura- Table 1 of Ref. [4], whereas all harmonics with relative amplitude > 4 × 10 −5 are retained for the W7-X calculations.…”
Section: Comparison Of E R Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculations in figure (1) are performed for the r/a = 0.5 surface of the LHD stellarator [41] in its standard configura- Table 1 of Ref. [4], whereas all harmonics with relative amplitude > 4 × 10 −5 are retained for the W7-X calculations.…”
Section: Comparison Of E R Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the highest β value ever achieved in stellarators is about 5% [24,25]. Several years ago this was a level target for the largest stellarators [17,26]. Just for comparison: the reference operation of ITER is considered with β < 3% [27].…”
Section: General Relations and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The device itself is very complex in design and construction, which is the main reason why development and implementation of stellarators is not very sought after. Experiments are still being carried out in Japan, at the Large Helical Device [7,8], and in Spain at the TJII [9,10]. The Wendelstein 7-X is currently being constructed in Germany.…”
Section: Nuclear Fusion and The Tokamak Reactormentioning
confidence: 99%