2022
DOI: 10.3390/ma15144842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design, Structural Inspection and Bio-Medicinal Applications of Some Novel Imine Metal Complexes Based on Acetylferrocene

Abstract: Some novel imine metal chelates with Cr3+, Mn2+, Fe3+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, and Cd2+ cations were produced from 2-acetylferrocene and 3-aminophenol. The new acetylferrocene azomethine ligand ((Z)-cyclopenta-1,3-dien-1-yl(2-(1-((3-hydroxyphenyl)imino)ethyl)cyclopenta-2,4-dien-1-yl)iron) and its metal ion chelates were constructed and elucidated using FT-IR, UV/Vis, 1HNMR, DTA/TGA, CHNClM studies, mass spectrometry and SEM analysis. According to the TGA/DTG investigation, the ferrocene moiety spontaneously di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 6 A, the peak at 1058 cm −1 (P=O) increased with Cd and OA in co-treatment. The peaks at 1648 cm −1 (C=O and C=N) and 1530 cm −1 (N−H) were shifted after exposure to Cd [ 33 , 34 , 35 ]. Notably, the characteristic peak at 2355 cm −1 (−SH) increased in the presence of Cd and OA, suggesting an interaction between Cd and the P=O or −SH groups of EPSs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 6 A, the peak at 1058 cm −1 (P=O) increased with Cd and OA in co-treatment. The peaks at 1648 cm −1 (C=O and C=N) and 1530 cm −1 (N−H) were shifted after exposure to Cd [ 33 , 34 , 35 ]. Notably, the characteristic peak at 2355 cm −1 (−SH) increased in the presence of Cd and OA, suggesting an interaction between Cd and the P=O or −SH groups of EPSs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantum chemical parameters were calculated using the following equations to determine them and the data were listed in Table 1. Electron Affinity (A) = ‐E LUMO , Ionization Energy (I) = ‐E HOMO , Chemical Hardness (η) = (E LUMO ‐ E HOMO )/2, Chemical Softness (σ) = 1/η, global softness (S) = 1/2η, electrophilicity index (ω) = μ 2 /2η, electronegativity (χ) = (I + A)/2, chemical potential (P i ) = − χ, ΔE = E LUMO ‐ E HOMO , additional electronic charge (N max ) = − P i /η 23,24 . The higher value of E HOMO indicated the ability to donate electrons as the E HOMO was typically linked to a molecule's capacity to release an electron while lower E LUMO values were related to the capacity to receive electrons from donor chemical molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, bond angles proved types of hybridization for example (OCH 3 ) had sp 3 hybridization with angles 109 , (C-B(OH) 2 ) showed sp 2 with angles 120 , (C=N-C) showed 120 too, which confirmed the presence of lone pair on N-atom. 21,22 The quantum chemical parameters were calculated using the following equations to determine them and the data were listed in Table 1 23,24 The higher value of E HOMO indicated the ability to donate electrons as the E HOMO was typically linked to a molecule's capacity to release an electron while lower E LUMO values were related to the capacity to receive electrons from donor chemical molecules. To contribute its unshared electrons to the iron's (mild steel) vacant d-orbital, an excellent inhibitor should have high E HOMO and low E LUMO values, and the free orbitals of inhibitor molecules should be able to accept the unshared electrons that were transmitted from the mild steel surface, and the energy gap should be as narrow as feasible.…”
Section: Dft Theoretical Studies Of the Free Ligandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the analytical data, the studied complexes exhibit a 1:2 stoichiometry (M:L) for BTGFe and BTGNi and a 1:1 stoichiometry for BTGPd. Except for the BTGFe complex, which has a mono‐electrolyte nature (62.8 Ω −1 cm 2 mol −1 ), 22 all complexes appear to be non‐conducting based on lower molar conductivity values (13–22 Ω −1 cm 2 mol −1 ) 23…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%