2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.12.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Strategies for Low Embodied Carbon and Low Embodied Energy Buildings: Principles and Examples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This distinction is also reflected in some mandatory regulations [15,16], e.g., the Swiss Minergie ® certification system, and technical standards [17,18]. This paper is mainly devoted to exploring the first area, with the understanding that in a context such as the one described, a traditional LCA study may be difficult to apply [19]; furthermore, the use of environmental certifications, such as Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs), seems intended for a limited number of projects, buildings, and countries [20].…”
Section: Embodied Energy and Embodied Carbon As Indicators To Assess The Building Life Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This distinction is also reflected in some mandatory regulations [15,16], e.g., the Swiss Minergie ® certification system, and technical standards [17,18]. This paper is mainly devoted to exploring the first area, with the understanding that in a context such as the one described, a traditional LCA study may be difficult to apply [19]; furthermore, the use of environmental certifications, such as Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs), seems intended for a limited number of projects, buildings, and countries [20].…”
Section: Embodied Energy and Embodied Carbon As Indicators To Assess The Building Life Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means a transition from an all-encompassing assessment approach derived from a traditional LCA study, to one that considers two categories of effects. It is a simplification, but it should be seen as an opportunity to extend the applicability of methods and tools for assessing the building life cycle [20][21][22][23]. In addition, these indicators are relatively easy to interpret.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to reduce the global carbon footprint of construction, low-energy buildings must use low embodied energy and low embodied carbon materials and construction methods to decrease their impact. Lupíšek et al (189) proposed different strategies to decrease both embodied energy and carbon through three steps: (a) reduction of the amount of materials needed throughout the entire life cycle through optimization of the layout plan, optimization of the structural system, low-maintenance design, flexible and adaptable design, and components service life optimization; (b) substitution of traditional materials for alternatives with lower environmental impacts with reuse of building parts and elements, utilization of recycled materials, substitution for bio-based and raw materials, and use of innovative materials with lower environmental impacts, design for deconstruction, and use of recyclable materials; and (c) reduction of the construction stage impact.…”
Section: Moving Beyond Operational Energy Optimization: Minimizing Embodied Energy/carbon and Carbon Storage In Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the examples that Lupíšek et al (189) present shows that substituting a masonry structure designed according to current standards by a masonry structure in a Passive House building increased the embodied energy by 8% but decreased the embodied carbon by 9%, showing that embodied energy and embodied carbon show decoupling in their accounting. Moreover, if the building is constructed with a light reinforced concrete with timber envelope, the embodied energy decreases 10% from the reference building and the embodied carbon by 32%.…”
Section: Moving Beyond Operational Energy Optimization: Minimizing Embodied Energy/carbon and Carbon Storage In Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers deal with various wall fragments with advanced material forms and their characteristics, such as decrement factor and time lag [1], reduction of embodied energies and carbon [2], incorporation of transparent thermal insulations [3], vast analysis of thermal bridges in structures [4] and also with green roofs [5]. It is generally known that building envelope is one of the most important elements of the building.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%