2010 International Conference on Embedded Computer Systems: Architectures, Modeling and Simulation 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icsamos.2010.5642058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design space exploration of systolic realization of QR factorization on a runtime reconfigurable platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6.27 and Fig.6. 28. Other kernels have very close values, due to small differences in switching activity, for the power.…”
Section: Time Energy and Scalabilitymentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6.27 and Fig.6. 28. Other kernels have very close values, due to small differences in switching activity, for the power.…”
Section: Time Energy and Scalabilitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…REDEFINE CGRA implementation of QR factorization is presented in [28] where the performance is achieved by Custom Functional Unit (CFU) inside Compute Elements (CEs). The focus of [28] is on emulation of systolic schedule for GR on REDEFINE and hence synthesis of systolic array on REDEFINE.…”
Section: Cgrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…REDEFINE CGRA implementation of Q-R decomposition is presented in [13] where the performance is achieved by Custom Functional Unit (CFU) inside Compute Elements (CEs). The focus of [13] is on emulation of systolic schedule for GR on REDEFINE and hence synthesis of systolic array on REDEFINE.…”
Section: Previous Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of [13] is on emulation of systolic schedule for GR on REDEFINE and hence synthesis of systolic array on REDEFINE. The major disadvantage of [13] is the high computational complexity, coupled with high latency problems on REDEFINE's NoC, as matrix size increases.…”
Section: Previous Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%