2017
DOI: 10.1007/s13233-017-5064-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design shape of CDI cell applied with APSf and SPEEK and performance in MCDI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 13 shows the velocity profiles of the CDI rectangular flow channel at different flow rates. It can be seen that the velocities on the outside are higher than the velocities on the inside at high flow rates unlike some previous reports (Gaikwad et al 2020;Jeon et al 2017). That means that the distribution of the solution is not uniform so that the desalination efficiency of the outside of the CDI is higher than that of the inside.…”
Section: Adsorption Kineticscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Figure 13 shows the velocity profiles of the CDI rectangular flow channel at different flow rates. It can be seen that the velocities on the outside are higher than the velocities on the inside at high flow rates unlike some previous reports (Gaikwad et al 2020;Jeon et al 2017). That means that the distribution of the solution is not uniform so that the desalination efficiency of the outside of the CDI is higher than that of the inside.…”
Section: Adsorption Kineticscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…During operation, the suspended electrolyte was operated in semicontinuous single circulation mode cyclically with alternative “desalination” (30 min) and “brine discharge” (15 min) periods (Figure a). During desalination period, a typical saltwater containing 0.5 g L –1 NaCl was continuously pumped in the middle chamber at a flow rate of 1.7 mL min –1 in single pass mode, and the electrolyte containing 2.5% suspended electrodes in 0.5 g L –1 NaCl (60 mL) was circulated at a flow rate of 4 mL min –1 . A constant voltage of 1.2 V was added on the electrodes using an electrochemical station (CHI 660E, Chenhua, China).…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target was an error tolerance of 0.0001. The inlet pressure was dependent on the flux setting, and the outlet pressure was set as atmospheric pressure (1 MPa) . To simplify the simulated process, the ion transfer process was ignored.…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%