2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2022.101148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design science and neuroscience: A systematic review of the emergent field of Design Neurocognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to changes in data capture, greater samples sizes would be required for statistically significant results. Neuroscience focused studies in the field of design research have mean sample sizes of 20.97 (SD=14.55) and in the field of neuroscience 27.44 (SD=12) (Balters et al, 2022). These indicate the typical sizes of study required for a full run of the study presented in this paper.…”
Section: Limitations and Further Workmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In addition to changes in data capture, greater samples sizes would be required for statistically significant results. Neuroscience focused studies in the field of design research have mean sample sizes of 20.97 (SD=14.55) and in the field of neuroscience 27.44 (SD=12) (Balters et al, 2022). These indicate the typical sizes of study required for a full run of the study presented in this paper.…”
Section: Limitations and Further Workmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Design neurocognition is the neurocognitive study of designers. Most design neurocognition studies adopt one of three non-invasive brain activity measurement tools EEG, fNIRS, or fMRI (Balters et al, 2023;Borgianni & Maccioni, 2020;Gero & Milovanovic, 2020). The discussion of fNIRS and fMRI is out of the scope of this work, since it uses EEG.…”
Section: Brain Anatomy and Brain Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research into design and creativity has evolved in the last two decades (Cascini et al, 2022). Neurophysiological measurement of designers' cognitive processes represents one of the innovative approaches (Balters et al, 2023;Gero & Milovanovic, 2020). Whilst multiple neurocognitive studies have produced significant results, they are still far from results that can be directly used in real design situations (Borgianni & Maccioni, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these approaches are limited by their intrinsic subjective nature and extensive qualitative data processing requirements (Chiu and Shu, 2011; Hay et al , 2017). To overcome some of these limitations and combine more quantitative methodologies in design cognition research, an emerging research area in the design research community, often referred to as “design neurocognition”, is seeking to apply techniques from cognitive neuroscience to measure brain activity related to design and advance knowledge of design cognition (Liu et al , 2018; Goucher-Lambert et al , 2019; Hu and Shealy, 2019; Gero and Milovanovic, 2020; Vieira et al , 2020; Zhao et al , 2020; Balters et al , 2023; Hay et al , 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%