2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijmcdm.2016.075623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design safer and greener road projects by using a multi-objective evolutionary approach

Abstract: Over the past few years, both recognizing sustainable development and improving road safety have been main issues in policies for transport and mobility in Europe. Since 2001, the European Commission had published several reports about the improvement of the level of safety and sustainability on the European road network. However, few tools or methodologies have been developed to support actively the road sector in the design of safer and greener roads. Consequently, this research project aims to develop a mul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past two decades, there has been a growth of interest by policy makers in the use of composite indices for road safety assessment that aggregate in a summary indicator the various parameters at hand (Coll et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2015;Castro Nuño and Arévalo-Quijada, 2018). Most of the available methodologies for assessing road safety composite indicators rely on multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods (Sarrazin and De Smet, 2016), each with its own advantages and disadvantages (El Gibari et al, 2019;Wątróbski, 2016;Velasquez and Hester, 2013). Table 1 summarizes the main strengths and weaknesses of the most common MCDM methods in the light of their application to road safety performance.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Literature On Dea And Other Multi-criteri...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past two decades, there has been a growth of interest by policy makers in the use of composite indices for road safety assessment that aggregate in a summary indicator the various parameters at hand (Coll et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2015;Castro Nuño and Arévalo-Quijada, 2018). Most of the available methodologies for assessing road safety composite indicators rely on multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods (Sarrazin and De Smet, 2016), each with its own advantages and disadvantages (El Gibari et al, 2019;Wątróbski, 2016;Velasquez and Hester, 2013). Table 1 summarizes the main strengths and weaknesses of the most common MCDM methods in the light of their application to road safety performance.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Literature On Dea And Other Multi-criteri...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we may use a complementary methodology to solve the multicriteria problem. However, a detailed analysis of this solving process goes beyond the scope of this paper (Sarrazin and De Smet, 2014).…”
Section: Current and Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%