2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2944119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Quality Metrics to Determine the Suitability and Cost-Effect of Self-* Capabilities for Autonomic Computing Systems

Abstract: Every software in the universe requires maintenance and management during its life cycle. The manual management of software is costly and sometimes error-prone. The other solution is autonomic computing that induces self-management capabilities, ''self-*services'', in software systems with the help of autonomic managers. The design quality of a self-management capability affects the computing infrastructure regarding processing load, the memory requirement, data channel demand and performance of perturbation r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A best suite of design quality metrics for offering self‐management capabilities is discussed in Reference 49. The objective of this work is to include the self‐management capabilities in software systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A best suite of design quality metrics for offering self‐management capabilities is discussed in Reference 49. The objective of this work is to include the self‐management capabilities in software systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a real-time system, the response time is always critical [63]. In the framework of MeDIC, we model the response time (T r ) as the time elapsed since a Subscriber agent originates a request to the reception of data in the required format.…”
Section: A the Evaluation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the role of complexity is recognized in [12] where the authors propose a set of design quality metrics to assess the design quality of self-management capabilities and where complexity and decision complexity are software quality estimators used in the proposed approach. Nevertheless, the decision complexity formula is computed and used in a different way that the complexity estimator suggested in this research.…”
Section: A Architectural Decision Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Content may change prior to final publication. [39] 2009, 2010, 2018 Source code Object-oriented complexity metrics [35] 2012 Graphs Estimation of dependency cycles and weights in nodes [37] 2015 Architectural structures Complexity and stability [26] [25] 2015, 2017 Design decision networks Meta-models relating qualities to estimate the evolution of design decisions [30] [36] 2017 Code Detect interconnections between elements [36] 2018 Graphs Architecture recovery techniques [40] 2018 Code Complexity analysis trend for predictive analysis [12] 2019 Graphs Estimation of decision complexity of selfmanagement capabilities and similarities between nodes last column of Table 2 to compute the number of nodes (i.e. the decisions) and their links between them.…”
Section: A Quality Decisions Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%