The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Biomedical Engineering - From Theory to Applications 2011
DOI: 10.5772/21669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Principles for Microfluidic Biomedical Diagnostics in Space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The onboard laboratory miniaturization included also the fluidic components (e.g., pumps, valves, electronics), thus paving the way to the use of advanced biosensors for screening food safety and water quality in space (Roda et al, 2018). Following the proofs of concept and wearable technologies suited to monitor astronauts' health, the biosensing diagnostic instrumentation, most reasonably based on electrochemical and optical detectors, was argued as a secondary future option for in-flight water biochemical analyses (Choi et al, 2018;Limero and Wallace, 2017;Nelson, 2011). In particular, the amperometric biosensors were proved sensitive to monitor different water analytes, chemical contaminants (e.g., pesticides, organophosphates, carbamates), and numerous microbial biomarkers successfully targeted to detect the major microbiological agents, food-and water-borne pathogens (e.g., E. coli, Salmonella, L. monocytogenes, C. jejuni, B. cereus, M. smegmatis) (Grieshaber et al, 2008;Velusamy et al, 2010).…”
Section: System Miniaturization and Future Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The onboard laboratory miniaturization included also the fluidic components (e.g., pumps, valves, electronics), thus paving the way to the use of advanced biosensors for screening food safety and water quality in space (Roda et al, 2018). Following the proofs of concept and wearable technologies suited to monitor astronauts' health, the biosensing diagnostic instrumentation, most reasonably based on electrochemical and optical detectors, was argued as a secondary future option for in-flight water biochemical analyses (Choi et al, 2018;Limero and Wallace, 2017;Nelson, 2011). In particular, the amperometric biosensors were proved sensitive to monitor different water analytes, chemical contaminants (e.g., pesticides, organophosphates, carbamates), and numerous microbial biomarkers successfully targeted to detect the major microbiological agents, food-and water-borne pathogens (e.g., E. coli, Salmonella, L. monocytogenes, C. jejuni, B. cereus, M. smegmatis) (Grieshaber et al, 2008;Velusamy et al, 2010).…”
Section: System Miniaturization and Future Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, selected devices and their supporting reagents must remain viable for years, while operating safely and reliably in extreme conditions (e.g., in the absence of gravity). Technology flexibility is also critical, since monitoring systems should be able to accept different kind of samples spanning from biomedical (e.g., blood, urine, saliva samples, routine chemistry, cell cultures) to water and environmental samples (Nelson, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical devices suitable for spaceflight must minimally utilize onboard resources and operate under microgravity conditions, which also complicates the collection and management of biological samples. Additionally, these devices must function in the presence of relatively high levels of radiation [24,25]. Moreover, while specific studies are yet to be reported, it is reasonable to assume that in microgravity, the distinct conditions of diffusion processes and the absence of convection may also modify interactions between nanoparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%