17th IEEE/NPSS Symposium Fusion Engineering (Cat. No.97CH36131)
DOI: 10.1109/fusion.1997.687800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design-point determination for the commercial spherical tokamak, ARIES-ST

Abstract: Motivations and constraints regarding the identification of DT-fueled, 1,000-We-class commercial powerplant embodiments of the (low-aspect-ratio) spherical tokamak (ST) are summarized in the context of ongoing ARIES studies. Key design drivers are identified and the prospects of this approach to magnetic fusion energy are considered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the density profile factor of α n = 0.634 and the temperature profile factor of α T = 0.702, we can see that our projection fits the DIII-D high equivalent D-T yield results [4] very well. When compared to the ARIES-RS [5] (SC, A=4) and ARIES-ST [6] (NC, A=1.6) physics projections, our results are more conservative. For the following calculations, in addition to the projected physics performance we also assumed a bootstrap fraction of 90%.…”
Section: Equilibrium Physicsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…With the density profile factor of α n = 0.634 and the temperature profile factor of α T = 0.702, we can see that our projection fits the DIII-D high equivalent D-T yield results [4] very well. When compared to the ARIES-RS [5] (SC, A=4) and ARIES-ST [6] (NC, A=1.6) physics projections, our results are more conservative. For the following calculations, in addition to the projected physics performance we also assumed a bootstrap fraction of 90%.…”
Section: Equilibrium Physicsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…2, the key difference between the SC and NC design is the standoff distance of the inboard design. Similar to the ARIES designs [5,6], we selected a standoff distance of 1.3 m for the SC design for superconducting magnet protection, and 0.25 m for the NC design. The latter choice is to minimize the amount of induced radioactive in order to maintain the Cu-alloy to be accepted as class-C waste at the end of reactor life.…”
Section: Ga-system Codementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations