1997
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1997.03540440085041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error and Judgment in Engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to accomplish this, pathologists must attempt to identify the sources of both random and systematic error within the diagnostic strategies and thought processes they follow when arriving at a diagnosis and communicating it to a clinician. In this paradigm, error detection should be viewed as an opportunity to improve the systems being used to reach a diagnosis [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to accomplish this, pathologists must attempt to identify the sources of both random and systematic error within the diagnostic strategies and thought processes they follow when arriving at a diagnosis and communicating it to a clinician. In this paradigm, error detection should be viewed as an opportunity to improve the systems being used to reach a diagnosis [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%