2011
DOI: 10.1787/5k44zc5rx644-en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Options for International Assessment and Review (IAR) and International Consultations and Analysis (ICA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This analysis builds on other recent CCXG work in the areas of unit accounting (Prag et al, 2011), market mechanism design and governance (Prag et al, 2012) and measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) of emissions commitments and actions (Ellis et al, 2011). The paper benefitted from discussions with delegates from a wide range of countries and organisations at the CCXG Global Forum in March 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This analysis builds on other recent CCXG work in the areas of unit accounting (Prag et al, 2011), market mechanism design and governance (Prag et al, 2012) and measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) of emissions commitments and actions (Ellis et al, 2011). The paper benefitted from discussions with delegates from a wide range of countries and organisations at the CCXG Global Forum in March 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Along with their NDCs, Parties will also communicate information for clarity, transparency and understanding (CTU, Article 4.8) of the NDC. 1 Article 4 also requires Parties to account for their NDCs (Article 4.13). Parties are to account for internationally transferred mitigation outcomes (ITMOs, Article 6) during the processes of accounting for and tracking progress towards NDCs.…”
Section: Executive Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of lessons can be drawn from experience with existing assessment and review processes relevant to mitigation under the UNFCCC (van Asselt, Saelen and Pauw, 2015;Ellis et al, 2011): • It is possible to combine both one-off and recurring technical reviews, depending on needs;…”
Section: Current Review Provisions and Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%