1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(97)00161-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design optimization method for compliant mechanisms and material microstructure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As there is only one active constraint (the material resource constraint), the OC method can be used to provide more rapid convergence when compared with the sequential linear programming algorithm [15,16]. This shows that the OC method is the suitable method over the other methods as discussed by Kikuchi and Nishiwaki (1998) Normally, the topology optimization is carried out using ANSYS topological optimization tool or MATLAB software. This involves the following stages, viz, preprocessor, Solution and Post processor [17,18].…”
Section: Optimality Criteria (Oc) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there is only one active constraint (the material resource constraint), the OC method can be used to provide more rapid convergence when compared with the sequential linear programming algorithm [15,16]. This shows that the OC method is the suitable method over the other methods as discussed by Kikuchi and Nishiwaki (1998) Normally, the topology optimization is carried out using ANSYS topological optimization tool or MATLAB software. This involves the following stages, viz, preprocessor, Solution and Post processor [17,18].…”
Section: Optimality Criteria (Oc) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the loads described in the model were the same with those in the DPB of the case , the loadings were different from the real situation because the output force P O had influence on the X O and the P O should be considered into the calculation of X O . Frecker et al (1997) and Kikuchi et al (1998) also considered the same loadings in their designs. Hetrick (1999) also used two loadings, though, in a different way.…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3)-(7), a number of techniques have been developed, including ground structure (Ananthasuresh et al, 1994;Frecker et al, 1997), homogenization method (Kikuchi et al, 1998), simple isotropic material with penalization (SIMP) (Sigmund, 1997), and level set method . While different in their representation and optimization schemes, these methods are all rooted in the research on structural topology optimization that has been developed into an industrial technology with commercial success (Bendsoe and Sigmund, 2003).…”
Section: Design Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%