2005
DOI: 10.1049/ip-map:20045087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Yagi–Uda antennas using comprehensive learning particle swarm optimisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 3, we show the results obtained by our PDA, designed using SED, compared with the results obtained by: (Baskar et al, 2005), who used PSO to optimize the element spacing and lengths of a YagiUda antenna; (Goudos et al, 2010) who used Generalized Differential Evolution applied to Yagi-Uda antenna design; (Li, 2007), who used Differential Evolution to optimize the geometric parameters of YagiUda antennas; (Yan et al, 2010), who designed a wide-band Yagi-Uda antenna with X-shape driven dipoles and parasitic elements using differential evolution algorithm, obtaining a bandwidth of 20%. Both (Baskar et al, 2005), (Goudos et al, 2010) and (Li, 2007) decide to perform the optimization only at the center frequency, and this is a simpler task and can lead to better results than an optimization over the whole antenna bandwidth, which is the choice we made in our SED design.…”
Section: Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Table 3, we show the results obtained by our PDA, designed using SED, compared with the results obtained by: (Baskar et al, 2005), who used PSO to optimize the element spacing and lengths of a YagiUda antenna; (Goudos et al, 2010) who used Generalized Differential Evolution applied to Yagi-Uda antenna design; (Li, 2007), who used Differential Evolution to optimize the geometric parameters of YagiUda antennas; (Yan et al, 2010), who designed a wide-band Yagi-Uda antenna with X-shape driven dipoles and parasitic elements using differential evolution algorithm, obtaining a bandwidth of 20%. Both (Baskar et al, 2005), (Goudos et al, 2010) and (Li, 2007) decide to perform the optimization only at the center frequency, and this is a simpler task and can lead to better results than an optimization over the whole antenna bandwidth, which is the choice we made in our SED design.…”
Section: Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both (Baskar et al, 2005), (Goudos et al, 2010) and (Li, 2007) decide to perform the optimization only at the center frequency, and this is a simpler task and can lead to better results than an optimization over the whole antenna bandwidth, which is the choice we made in our SED design. Nonetheless, the results obtained by SED are better than the ones obtained by PSO and DE even at the center frequency.…”
Section: Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since its invention, continuous efforts have been put in optimizing its design for desired gain, impedance, SLL and bandwidth, etc., requirements using different optimization techniques based on traditional mathematical approaches [24,4,8,25,7,6,9] and Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques [16,35,34,3,19,31,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, [41] shows that PSO algorithm convergence is faster than GA and SA for the same problem and the main computational time is lower than SA, binary GA, real GA, binary hybrid GA, and real hybrid GA. The literature on the use of the PSO method in the design of antenna arrays is extensive, a sample of which can be found in [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. In this paper, the method of PSO is used to provide a comprehensive study of the design of linear and circular antenna arrays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%