2020 17th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technolo 2020
DOI: 10.1109/ecti-con49241.2020.9158107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Unbalance Slot Printed Dipole Antenna with Triangle Parasitic Element for DTV Receiver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 shows a comparison between previous works and the proposed portable wideband directional antenna scheme. Printed meander line antenna with magneto dielectric 467-1012 (73.69%) 0.86-1.65 10 × 25 × 1 (0.015λ × 0.039λ × 0.0015λ) [19] Printed dipole antenna 455-1070 (80.65%) −0.57-1.15 20 × 200 × 0.8 (0.031λ × 0.313λ × 0.001λ) [20] Printed dipole antenna 452-897 (65.97%) 2.09-3.85 45 × 250 × 1.6 (0.070λ × 0.391λ × 0.002λ) [21] Printed dipole antenna 441-890 (67.46%) 4.65 (peak) 35 × 243 × 1.6 (0.054λ × 0.380λ × 0.002λ) [23] Printed loop antenna 461-806 (54.45%) 1.9-2.5 165 × 165 × 0.8 (0.258λ × 0.258λ × 0.001λ) [24] Printed quasi-Yagi antenna 450-848 (61.32%) 3.5-4.6 200 × 240 × 1.6 (0.313λ × 0.376λ× 0.002λ) [26] Log-periodic antenna 470-790 (50.79%)…”
Section: Prototype Fabrication and Measured Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 3 shows a comparison between previous works and the proposed portable wideband directional antenna scheme. Printed meander line antenna with magneto dielectric 467-1012 (73.69%) 0.86-1.65 10 × 25 × 1 (0.015λ × 0.039λ × 0.0015λ) [19] Printed dipole antenna 455-1070 (80.65%) −0.57-1.15 20 × 200 × 0.8 (0.031λ × 0.313λ × 0.001λ) [20] Printed dipole antenna 452-897 (65.97%) 2.09-3.85 45 × 250 × 1.6 (0.070λ × 0.391λ × 0.002λ) [21] Printed dipole antenna 441-890 (67.46%) 4.65 (peak) 35 × 243 × 1.6 (0.054λ × 0.380λ × 0.002λ) [23] Printed loop antenna 461-806 (54.45%) 1.9-2.5 165 × 165 × 0.8 (0.258λ × 0.258λ × 0.001λ) [24] Printed quasi-Yagi antenna 450-848 (61.32%) 3.5-4.6 200 × 240 × 1.6 (0.313λ × 0.376λ× 0.002λ) [26] Log-periodic antenna 470-790 (50.79%)…”
Section: Prototype Fabrication and Measured Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the antennas commonly used for digital television signal reception include loop antennas, omnidirectional dipole antennas, monopoles, log-periodic dipole arrays (LPDA), and quasi-Yagi antennas [ 18 ]. The loop antennas, omnidirectional dipole antennas, and monopoles can receive signals from every direction but achieve a low gain [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Meanwhile, the LPDA and quasi-Yagi antennas realize a high gain by using multiple dipoles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quasi-Yagi and LPDA antennas have high gain from using multiple dipoles, but it is necessary to check the receiving direction and adjust the location because of directivity [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. On the other hand, the omni-directional dipole, monopole, and loop antennas can receive from all directions, but have low gain [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It operated at 452–897 MHz with gain of 2.1–3.9 dBi and a 250 mm × 45 mm antenna size. An unbalanced slot-printed dipole antenna with a triangular parasitic element for a DTV receiver was proposed with a size of 250 mm × 135 mm [ 13 ]. It covered 441–890 MHz with peak gain of 4.7 dBi.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%