2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.02.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of the PReferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (PROVE-AAA) Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Probably, the use of decision aids may also help to better align patient's preference. 21 The purpose of the present study is to detail the incidence and indication for a secondary intervention after EVAR, and the impact on early and long-term survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably, the use of decision aids may also help to better align patient's preference. 21 The purpose of the present study is to detail the incidence and indication for a secondary intervention after EVAR, and the impact on early and long-term survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of AAA repair by either surgical or endovascular techniques is to reduce the risk of rupture and death [ 8 ]. Through the development of EVAR, we can perform this safely and with improved morbidity and mortality compared to traditional open repair [ 9 ]. Endoleaks seem to be the Achilles' heel of EVAR, which can cause aneurysm sac growth and ultimately rupture [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, age- and frailty-specific outcomes should inform decision-making regarding the method of AAA repair. Among patients with robust physiologic reserve who are anatomically eligible and have equivalent mortality for either EVAR or OSR, the shared decision-making process between surgeons and patients should include patient preferences regarding long-term surveillance after EVAR vs the greater surgical stress of OSR . Our findings are limited by the inclusion of only patients undergoing AAA repairs and by the lack of data on AAA anatomy, patient preferences, and other outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%