2024
DOI: 10.7554/elife.91469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of the HPV-automated visual evaluation (PAVE) study: Validating a novel cervical screening strategy

Silvia de Sanjosé,
Rebecca B Perkins,
Nicole Campos
et al.

Abstract: To describe the HPV-Automated Visual Evaluation (PAVE) Study, an international, multi-centric study designed to evaluate a novel cervical screen-triage-treat strategy for resource-limited settings as part of a global strategy to reduce cervical cancer burden. The PAVE strategy involves: 1) screening with self-sampled HPV testing; 2) triage of HPV-positive participants with a combination of extended genotyping and visual evaluation of the cervix assisted by deep-learning-based automated visual evaluation (AVE);… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Larger studies using ScreenFire on self-collected samples are ongoing, both on WLWH and HIV-negative women. 46…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Larger studies using ScreenFire on self-collected samples are ongoing, both on WLWH and HIV-negative women. 46…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger studies using ScreenFire on self-collected samples are ongoing, both on WLWH and HIV-negative women. 46 Among study limitations is the use of frozen samples, some of which had been stored for over two years, which may affect the accuracy of some of our ScreenFire test results. Similarly, because the original study was not designed as a validation study, only Xpert HPV-positive and a random 10% of Xpert HPV-negative specimens on self-collection at baseline were stored and available for ScreenFire testing, possibly biasing our comparison as not all HPV-negative samples were stored for future testing.…”
Section: Tables 3a and 3bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of self-collection is key when implementing primary HPV testing in low-resource settings because of the potential of vastly increasing screening coverage through community or home-based self-collection, when compared to provider-collected specimens, which require a pelvic examination in a clinical setting. Larger studies using ScreenFire on selfcollected samples are ongoing, both on WLWH and HIVnegative women [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%