2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of switching multilinear model predictive control using gap metric

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In standard or regular MPC, control action is calculated by solving an online optimization problem at each time step. The computational burden of the controller is increased due to the complex structure of QP, resulting in a delayed response time . Furthermore, including constraints and variable interactions into the control algorithm (QP) results in a slower response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In standard or regular MPC, control action is calculated by solving an online optimization problem at each time step. The computational burden of the controller is increased due to the complex structure of QP, resulting in a delayed response time . Furthermore, including constraints and variable interactions into the control algorithm (QP) results in a slower response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational burden of the controller is increased due to the complex structure of QP, resulting in a delayed response time. 21 Furthermore, including constraints and variable interactions into the control algorithm (QP) results in a slower response. Alternatively, the computational burden of the MPC controller can be reduced by solving the QP fragmentally into small fractions and accelerating calculation time in control action utilizing online optimization called the Fast MPC approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%