2019
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2019.2935915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Robust Radar Detectors Through Random Perturbation of the Target Signature

Abstract: The paper addresses the problem of designing radar detectors more robust than Kelly's detector to possible mismatches of the assumed target signature, but with no performance degradation under matched conditions. The idea is to model the received signal under the signal-plus-noise hypothesis by adding a random component, parameterized via a design covariance matrix, that makes the hypothesis more plausible in presence of mismatches. Moreover, an unknown power of such component, to be estimated from the observa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Kelly's horizontal boundary best separates the H 0 cluster from any H 1 cluster under matched conditions; conversely, detectors with marked robust or selective behaviors exhibit an oblique linear or non-linear boundary, with increasing trend for robust behavior and decreasing trend for selective behavior, as visible in Fig. 1, respectively, for AMF and the robustified GLRT (ROB) [18] and for ACE and WABORT.…”
Section: B Detection In the Cfar Feature Planementioning
confidence: 96%
“…In particular, Kelly's horizontal boundary best separates the H 0 cluster from any H 1 cluster under matched conditions; conversely, detectors with marked robust or selective behaviors exhibit an oblique linear or non-linear boundary, with increasing trend for robust behavior and decreasing trend for selective behavior, as visible in Fig. 1, respectively, for AMF and the robustified GLRT (ROB) [18] and for ACE and WABORT.…”
Section: B Detection In the Cfar Feature Planementioning
confidence: 96%
“…A robust detector is then designed using second-order cone (SOC) programming [113][114][115][116][117]. A fourth method involves adding a random component in the test data under the signal-presence hypothesis, which makes the hypothesis more plausible when signal mismatch occurs [118].…”
Section: Adaptive Detection In the Presence Of Signal Mismatchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now consider the Wald test for the detection problem described in (10). According to [48], we can express the Wald test as…”
Section: Ps-wald-i Detector Designmentioning
confidence: 99%