2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.95.103001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of provably physical-constraint-preserving methods for general relativistic hydrodynamics

Abstract: The paper develops high-order physical-constraint-preserving (PCP) methods for general relativistic hydrodynamic (GRHD) equations, equipped with a general equation of state. Here the physical constraints, describing the admissible states of GRHD, are referred to the subluminal constraint on the fluid velocity and the positivity of the density, pressure and specific internal energy. Preserving these constraints is very important for robust computations, otherwise violating one of them will lead to the ill-posed… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The convexity of admissible state set is very useful in bound-preserving analysis, because it can help reduce the complexity of analysis if the schemes can be rewritten into certain convex combinations, see e.g., [51,53,40]. For the ideal MHD, the convexity of G * or G can be easily shown by definition.…”
Section: Basic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The convexity of admissible state set is very useful in bound-preserving analysis, because it can help reduce the complexity of analysis if the schemes can be rewritten into certain convex combinations, see e.g., [51,53,40]. For the ideal MHD, the convexity of G * or G can be easily shown by definition.…”
Section: Basic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where C s = γp/ρ is the sound speed. If true, the LF splitting property would be very useful in analyzing the PP property of the schemes with the LF flux, see its roles in [51,42,40] for the equations of hydrodynamics. Unfortunately, for the ideal MHD, (8) is untrue in general, as evidenced numerically in [11] for ideal gases.…”
Section: Basic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The robustness of that scheme was further demonstrated in [49] by extensive numerical tests and comparisons. In the last few years, significant advances have been made in developing bound-preserving high-order schemes for hyperbolic systems; see the pioneer works by Zhang and Shu [62,63,65], and more recent works, e.g., [31,57,37,15,53,50,59,61]. Balsara [5] proposed a self-adjusting PP limiter to enforce the positivity of the reconstructed solutions in a finite volume method for (1.1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robustness of that scheme was further demonstrated in [42] by extensive benchmark tests and comparisons. Recent years have witnessed significant progresses in developing high-order bound-preserving methods for hyperbolic systems (see, e.g., [54,55,48,56,25,50,31,51,44,53]) including the ideal MHD system [3,13,15,14] and the relativistic MHD system [46]. Two PP limiting techniques were developed in [3,13] for the finite volume or discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods for (1) to enforce the admissibility 1 of the reconstructed or DG solutions at certain nodal points.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%