1988 American Control Conference 1988
DOI: 10.23919/acc.1988.4789724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Proportional-Minus-Delay Action Feedback Controllers for Second- and Third-Order Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, some authors (Tallman and Smith 1958, Rudin 1976, Suh and Bien 1979, 1980, Marshall and Salehi 1982, Swisher and Tenqchen 1988, ha ve used intentional time delays in the controller design of ordinary systems. These studies have shown that the performance of the controlled system may be improved by the judicious use of time-delay actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, some authors (Tallman and Smith 1958, Rudin 1976, Suh and Bien 1979, 1980, Marshall and Salehi 1982, Swisher and Tenqchen 1988, ha ve used intentional time delays in the controller design of ordinary systems. These studies have shown that the performance of the controlled system may be improved by the judicious use of time-delay actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The proportional minus delay (PMD) controller for second-order systems has been studied in Suh andBien (1979, 1980), where it has been shown that an appropriate PMD controller performs an averaged derivative action and can thus replace the conventional proportional plus derivative (PD) controller, showing quick responses to input changes but being insensitive to highfrequency noises. The use of PMD controllers has been extended to third-order systems (Swisher and Tenqchen 1988). However, controllers using time-delay actions have been confined to single-input/single-output (SISO) second-or third-order systems and have no theoretical results on the analysis of their controllers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e deliberate use of retarded actions to stabilize a system is a topic that has been investigated in recent decades, among which are the pioneering contributions of [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Concerning derivative-free control based schemes, such as the proportional retarded (PR) scheme [19,25,[29][30][31], which consists in using the relation between the time derivative approximations in terms of a differential difference equation, involving a time delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a Furuta pendulum case study, where the underactuated variable is subject to an inherent output delay due to wireless signal transmission, is presented. The analysis of time delays in control systems is not a new topic; particularly, the addition of time delays in the control design has been studied for many years (see, e.g., [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]). In particular, the introduction of time delays in the control law avoids the use of techniques for estimating the derivative action, which is not an easy task under the presence of noise and delays in measurements and increases the cost and complexity of the overall controller design and tuning of the gains [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%