Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering 2001. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8555)
DOI: 10.1109/ccece.2001.933634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of one-degree and two-degrees of freedom controllers for indirect field orientation control induction machine drive system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deviation between the desired and actual performance is considered a drawback because it refers to lower stability margins. To avoid this drawback, a modification for this PI structure with the pole placement is presented in the following section [26].…”
Section: B Conventional Pi CC With Pole Placement Methods (2 Ndmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The deviation between the desired and actual performance is considered a drawback because it refers to lower stability margins. To avoid this drawback, a modification for this PI structure with the pole placement is presented in the following section [26].…”
Section: B Conventional Pi CC With Pole Placement Methods (2 Ndmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in [26], the conventional PI CC scheme can be rearranged to that shown in Fig. 6 where the open loop transfer function (when the delay block is neglected) is expressed by (15).…”
Section: Modified Conventional Pi CC With Pole Placement Methods ( mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations