1996
DOI: 10.1126/science.274.5295.2049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Nonionic Surfactants for Supercritical Carbon Dioxide

Abstract: (NMR) analysis, using the tris [3-(trifluoromethylhydroxymethylene)-(ϩ)camphorato]europium(III) complex. The compound was hydrolyzed to the corresponding acid and then the optical purity was enhanced up to 97% ee by cocrystallization with commercially available R-PEA. The optical purity was checked by NMR and circular dichroism spectra:[␣] D 25 ϭ Ϫ63.2 (C ϭ 1.01 g/liter tetrahydrofuran). 5. The isotherms were measured from A ϭ 100 to 5 Å 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
219
2
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
11
219
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3c-e,f,g, 8 We may estimate the ratio of (Q ) 0) cross sections shown in Figure 3 (from eq 1) 11 as 5.2 ( 0.7, assuming that the surfactant layer is "invisible" (F 2 ≈ F s ), and the scattering arises mainly from the D 2 O core. While the calculated (5.2) and experimental (1.58/0.43 ) 3.7) ratios are similar, we believe that the difference is outside the experimental error and that this arises from the neglect of interparticle interactions 12,13 and also the smaller, but finite, scattering from the surfactant. We are currently undertaking a more detailed analysis of the existing data to account for these factors, and these simulations will be reported at a later date, along with additional data from experiments that are currently in progress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…3c-e,f,g, 8 We may estimate the ratio of (Q ) 0) cross sections shown in Figure 3 (from eq 1) 11 as 5.2 ( 0.7, assuming that the surfactant layer is "invisible" (F 2 ≈ F s ), and the scattering arises mainly from the D 2 O core. While the calculated (5.2) and experimental (1.58/0.43 ) 3.7) ratios are similar, we believe that the difference is outside the experimental error and that this arises from the neglect of interparticle interactions 12,13 and also the smaller, but finite, scattering from the surfactant. We are currently undertaking a more detailed analysis of the existing data to account for these factors, and these simulations will be reported at a later date, along with additional data from experiments that are currently in progress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The graft copolymer with a PFOA backbone and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) grafts formed micelles which stabilized water in CO 2 , while the PTFE-b-PEO copolymer formed reverse micelles, and F(CF 2 ) 10 (CH 2 ) 10 H formed small aggregates of at most four chains. The block copolymer PS-b-PFOA forms micelles in CO 2 with a PS core and a PFOA shell and the data fits a polydisperse spherical core-shell model [45,46]. With an increase in CO 2 density, the change in polydispersity suggests the existence of a critical micelle density, or a density of CO 2 above which the micelles are broken up into soluble unimers.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Depressurization of the CO 2 or changing the CO 2 density will cause the contaminant to be released from the surfactant. For example, a block copolymer was used to extract deuterated oligomers into CO 2 [45], and a dendrimer was used to extract a water soluble, CO 2 -insoluble dye from the water phase into the CO 2 phase [52]. Detergents for CO 2 can be used for cleaning applications, such as "dry cleaning" using liquid CO 2 as the solvent instead of the common perchloroethylene, a probable human carcinogen [53].…”
Section: Applications and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eventually, with the discovery that fluoropolymers and polysiloxanes were indeed soluble in CO 2 , steric stabilizers were envisioned to stabilize emulsion and dispersion polymerizations in a CO 2 continuous phase. These surfactants consist mostly of amphiphilic block copolymers that have "CO 2 -philic" and "CO 2 -phobic" components, comprised of a polysiloxane or fluoropolymer block and a hydrophilic or lipophilic polymer block, respectively [13][14][15]. Self-assembly leads to the formation of micelles having a core of the CO 2 -phobic blocks adsorbed to the polymer and an outer corona of the CO 2 -philic blocks dispersed in CO 2 .…”
Section: Surfactantsmentioning
confidence: 99%