The directives of the 24th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) envision the completion of construction of the largest hydrocenters with underground structures and the beginning of construction of a number of new hydroelectric stations (lIES) with tunnel diversions in the current five-year period. For successful implementation of these tasks it is necessary to analyze the achieved results and to chart the basic courses of development of underground construction during the ninth five-year period.Definite successes were achieved in underground hydraulic construction during the 1966-1970 period. Many tunnels were comtmcted for various purposes and are operating on the Ust'-Khantaisk, Vilyuisk, Kapehagaisk, Inguri, Chirkeisk, Nurek, Tatevsk, Toktogul'sk, Charvaksk, and on other HES's. Speeds of driving and concreting attained on individual tunnel sections (Inguri, Tatevsk, and Nurek HES's, and intermountain diversion tunnels Arpa-Sevan and others) were on a par with the best achieved abroad. Advanced solutions were widely elucidated in the periodical press. * Much credit for the construction of underground hydraulic structures belongs to the Order of Lenin All-Union Gidrospetsstroi Trust. which developed and introduced the technology of construction of large hydraulic tunnels using self-propelled equipment. The work of Glavvostokgidro~nergostroi, Giavgidroen~rgostroi, Gmzgidro~nergostroi Trust, A rmgidroen~rgostroi, Ingurig~sstroi, and the Gidroproekt, Orgen~rgostroi, and Gidrospetsproekt Institutes, TNISGEI, MIS[, and also the 1966 conference-seminar on scientific investigation, planning, construction and operation of hydraulic tunnels and of underground hydroelectric stations [1, 2] greatly aided in the development and improvement of underground hydraulic construction during the past five-year period. I" Yet the results attained satisfy the increased demands. Average rates of driving and concreting of tunnels are about two to three times lower than the maximum, and costs and labor requirements remain high. This results from a number of administrative and technical shortcomings. In particular, the problems of supplying materials, spare parts, and equipment and those of allotment of personnel and improvement of their qualifications have not been completely solved. Construction-assembly work is often inadequately financed annually during construction. There are cases of faulty technological decisions. Large variations in the excavation cross section are allowed in drilling-blasting work. Unjustifiably heavy temporary shoring is erected. The standards used in planning tunnels lead in many cases to excessive safety factors, to increases in the dead load of the linings, and to more difficult requirements in their erection.All these shortcomings can, in our opinion, be eliminated in the current five-year period. Some steps have already been taken. In particular, the Org~nergostroi and Gidroproekt Institutes, together with TNISGI~I and SKB Mosgidrostal', have prepared new "Instructions for Planning Hy...