2019
DOI: 10.1108/rpj-04-2019-0108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of lightweight tree-shaped internal support structures for 3D printed shell models

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to design a lightweight tree-shaped internal support structure for fused deposition modeling (FDM) three-dimensional (3D) printed shell models. Design/methodology/approach A hybrid of an improved particle swarm optimization (PSO) and greedy strategy is proposed to address the topology optimization of the tree-shaped support structures, where the improved PSO is different from traditional PSO by integrating the best component of different particles into the global best par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See [72,73] for the details. It is worth mentioning that self-similar structures created by tree-like fractals have been used to reinforce a 3D printed structure [75,76]. In this case, solid models, not the point cloud, of the self-similar segments are used, which is not the focus in this study.…”
Section: Settings Of Ifs-based Fractalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [72,73] for the details. It is worth mentioning that self-similar structures created by tree-like fractals have been used to reinforce a 3D printed structure [75,76]. In this case, solid models, not the point cloud, of the self-similar segments are used, which is not the focus in this study.…”
Section: Settings Of Ifs-based Fractalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generating tree-supports can be described as the Euclidean Steiner Minimal Tree problem, which is at least NP-hard (Vanek et al , 2014). Zhu et al (2019b, 2019c) used a hybrid of a particle swarm optimization and a greedy algorithm to design the tree-supports. The method saves up to 8% material and 13% print time compared to the results obtained by the Autodesk Meshmixer (Schmidt and Umetani, 2014), and it has a computation time from minutes to hours.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of support is reliable, but they are notoriously harder to remove and more likely to damage the model. Another type of supports is the tree-like supports (Zhu et al , 2019c), which grow branches to touch the overhangs [Figure 1(b)]. Tree supports use less material and have less contacts with the overhangs, so that they are easier to remove and cause less damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al (2019) proposed a local barycenter-based tree-support algorithm that has the nice property of higher efficiency and less material consumption. Zhu et al (2019aZhu et al ( , 2019b proposed a hybrid of PSO and greedy algorithm to minimize the support volume of the tree-supports (Figure 1(c)) for 3D printed models. Zhou et al (2019) used the Lindenmayer system (Lsystem) to simulate the plants' growing process to generate a symmetric tree-support and eliminated branches without intersecting the 3D model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%