2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 (LRRK2) Inhibitors Using a Crystallographic Surrogate Derived from Checkpoint Kinase 1 (CHK1)

Abstract: Mutations in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2), such as G2019S, are associated with an increased risk of developing Parkinson's disease. Surrogates for the LRRK2 kinase domain based on checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) mutants were designed, expressed in insect cells infected with baculovirus, purified, and crystallized. X-ray structures of the surrogates complexed with known LRRK2 inhibitors rationalized compound potency and selectivity. The CHK1 10-point mutant was preferred, following assessment of surrogate bi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
4
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protection of the ATP-binding site and the hinge region by MLi-2 are consistent with other inhibitor bound homolog kinase structures (57,58) although our data also re ects the dynamic change that the binding of MLi-2 has not only on the kinase domain but also on LRRK2 RCKW overall. Essentially any region in LRRK2 RCKW that interfaces with the kinase domain will sense binding of nucleotide or an inhibitor.…”
Section: Mapping the Conformational Changes Induced By Mli-2 Using Hysupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The protection of the ATP-binding site and the hinge region by MLi-2 are consistent with other inhibitor bound homolog kinase structures (57,58) although our data also re ects the dynamic change that the binding of MLi-2 has not only on the kinase domain but also on LRRK2 RCKW overall. Essentially any region in LRRK2 RCKW that interfaces with the kinase domain will sense binding of nucleotide or an inhibitor.…”
Section: Mapping the Conformational Changes Induced By Mli-2 Using Hysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In contrast to MLi-2 and LRRK2-IN-1, which are type I kinase inhibitors, we show that in the presence of a type II kinase inhibitor, rebastinib, G2019S LRRK2 remained cytosolic con rming the predictions of Deniston and coworkers (2020) (13), that docking to MTs is extremely sensitive to the conformational state of the kinase domain. Although the MLi-2 complex is catalytically inactive, MLi-2, which is a competitive inhibitor of ATP, nevertheless locks the kinase into an active-like conformation (58). In contrast, rebastinib is likely to stabilize a DYG/DFG-out/open and inactive conformation of the kinase domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to MLi-2 and LRRK2-IN-1, which are type I kinase inhibitors, we show that in the presence of a type II kinase inhibitor, rebastinib, G2019S LRRK2 remained cytosolic confirming the predictions of Deniston and coworkers (2020) (13), that docking to MTs is extremely sensitive to the conformational state of the kinase domain. Although the MLi-2 complex is catalytically inactive, MLi-2, which is a competitive inhibitor of ATP, nevertheless locks the kinase into an active-like conformation (58). In contrast, rebastinib is likely to stabilize a DYG/DFGout/open and inactive conformation of the kinase domain.…”
Section: Filament Formation Is Dependent On Unleashing the Catalytic mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3C). Since inhibitors that capture the kinase in an ATP-bound active-like state (25,26) are known to induce filament formation (13,14) and all other filament forming LRRK2 mutants (N1437H, R1441G/C and Y1699C) also results in hyper-kinase activity in cells (11)(12)(13), we expect that our structure captures an active kinase conformation, which may be facilitated through oligomerization. Taken together, our data suggests that MTbinding plays a scaffolding role in the oligomerization and activation of LRRK2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%