1997
DOI: 10.21236/ada344356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Infrasonic Arrays

Abstract: The Infrasound Experts Group of the Geneva Conference on Disarmament Ad Hoc Committee on a Nuclear Test Ban has recommended an infrasound array design consisting of four elements, with three elements forming an equilateral triangle and the fourth at the center of the triangle. The Experts recommended that the sides of the triangle be in the range 1 to 3 km. In this report, in an attempt to place constraints on the array aperture, we evaluate the beamforming azimuthal estimation error of such arrays and compare… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of broad correlation between mining events and infrasound sources may reflect a combination of the seasonal variations in the winds, the limited station distribution, as well as the possibility of reduced atmospheric infrasound coupling from some types of mining explosions. Further, signal detection might have been degraded by the lack of signal correlation between array elements for higher frequency signals [ Christie and Campus , ; Blandford , ]. Additionally, if these signals have frequencies at or above 4 Hz, they may not have been detected because the amplitude of high‐frequency infrasound decays more rapidly with distance.…”
Section: Infrasound Detections and Locationssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of broad correlation between mining events and infrasound sources may reflect a combination of the seasonal variations in the winds, the limited station distribution, as well as the possibility of reduced atmospheric infrasound coupling from some types of mining explosions. Further, signal detection might have been degraded by the lack of signal correlation between array elements for higher frequency signals [ Christie and Campus , ; Blandford , ]. Additionally, if these signals have frequencies at or above 4 Hz, they may not have been detected because the amplitude of high‐frequency infrasound decays more rapidly with distance.…”
Section: Infrasound Detections and Locationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The lack of events in these areas could be because there are few sources which preclude arrivals at the stations, or the average distance to nearby arrays is large and the accompanying signals are attenuated. Since signal correlation between array elements has been shown to decrease with increasing source‐receiver distance and with increasing frequency [ Blandford , ], one would expect to detect a smaller number of signals at larger distances. In order to quantify array coverage, the average distance from the closest three stations to each grid point across the study area is estimated and contoured (Figure ).…”
Section: Infrasound Detections and Locationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Azimuth is measured from north. The calculations are based on Δc = 15 m/s and Δθ = 5° as found by Blandford (1997). 24…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azimuth is measured from north. The calculations are based on Δc = 15 m/s and Δθ = 5° as found by Blandford (1997). 20.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results are shown in blue for a 1.0-km aperture array; in green for a 2.0-km aperture array and in red for a 3.0-km aperture array. The correlation model parameters are Δc = 15 m/s and Δθ = 5° (Blandford, 1997). 31…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%