Design of hydrophobic polyurethane–magnetite iron oxide-titanium dioxide nanocomposites for oil-water separation

Surface Modification of NiO‐Al2O3 Nanocomposites using Stearic Acid as a Modifier and their Applications in Self‐cleaning and Removal of Dyes

“…A comparison of surface modification conditions used for the nanocomposites useful for self‐cleaning from literature with that of the present study is given in Table S2. One can note that the surface modification conditions, used in the present study, are simple, faster, and economical [32,56–58,84–89] …”

“…Satria et al have prepared polyurethane foam layered with PDA/PPy/PANI and incorporated with Fe‐stearic acid by sonication for 5 h at 60 °C and stirring for 24 h at room temperature [57] . Barani et al modified Fe 3 O 4 ‐TiO 2 by stirring it with polyurethane for 6 h at 40 °C [58] . Ionbani et al modified ZnO−SiO 2 using polysiloxane, by autoclave treatment at 110 °C for 4 h [59] .…”

Biorenewable vegetable oil based nonisocyanate polyurethanes and nanocomposites; formulation, characterisation, biodegradation, anticorrosion and antifouling coatings

“…Our goal is to achieve the balance between prevention of fouling and maintaining an acceptable level of hydrodynamic performance. 63 Thermal analysis of NIPU and NIPU-F In Fig. 7a, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) is shown for the samples (NIPU and NIPU-F) from ambient temperature to 600 1C, which deduced the thermal stability of these films.…”

Influence of microphase separation and crosslinking density on dynamic viscoelastic properties of nano‐Fe3O4 modified polyurethane

“…31 The XRD pattern of both PU and PU-Fe 3 O 4 -1 (PU-Fe 3 O 4 with other Fe 3 O 4 content are quite similar and not shown) displayed a broad peak at around 20 , suggesting the characteristic pattern of a low crystallinity material (Figure 1c). 32 3.2 | Microphase separation analysis of nano-Fe 3 O 4 modified PU…”