1987
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)55388-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Hydraulic Force Control Systems with State Estimate Feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…0'1367(_S_2_ + 2.376s + 1)(~+ I) G(,)~9.5'" 11' ' ' ' r (8) Sl-S-+l _s_+1 132. 6 42.38 (7) For disturbance rejection at plant output, the sensitive reduction problem has to be solved. Therefore, an upper tolerance is imposed on the sensitive function.…”
Section: L+g(s)p(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…0'1367(_S_2_ + 2.376s + 1)(~+ I) G(,)~9.5'" 11' ' ' ' r (8) Sl-S-+l _s_+1 132. 6 42.38 (7) For disturbance rejection at plant output, the sensitive reduction problem has to be solved. Therefore, an upper tolerance is imposed on the sensitive function.…”
Section: L+g(s)p(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method, however, relies heavily on on-line parameter estimation and consequently demands a large computational time. Conrad and Jensen [7] used combinations of velocity feed-forward, output feedback, and a Luenberger observer with state estimate feedback for force control of a double-rod hydraulic actuator. However, load variations were not considered in their study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the near incompressibility of hydraulic oil and the coupling between the pressures of the actuator and its velocity, even minor velocity disturbances may correspond to significant disturbances in the pressures of the actuator and thus in the controlled output (Esfandiari and Sepehri, 2014). A common method of improving the performance in situations where velocity disturbances are measurable involves feed forwarding from the disturbance, see for example (Conrad and Jensen, 1987) and (Jiao et al, 2004). As will be seen in Sections 4 and 5 however, a large abrupt peaking of the control error may occur under certain operation conditions that is not reduced by feed forwarding from the velocity disturbance and appears to be a previously unaddressed phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The load motion compensation was initially discussed for hydraulic actuators in [8], where it is shown that closed-loop control with force feedback is ineffective without velocity feedforward, or full state feedback. The influence of the load motion is shown for a hydraulic actuator in [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%