2018
DOI: 10.2175/106143017x15131012188240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Gravel‐Sand Filter for Arsenic Removal: A Case Study of Muzaffargarh District in Pakistan

Abstract: Arsenic decontamination of drinking water has grabbed significant attention due to arsenic's serious effects on health. A novel gravel-sand filter (GSF) holding zero-valent iron plates was designed and constructed in Muzaffargarh district (Pakistan) for arsenic removal from drinking water with lower iron concentration (0.3 ppm). The GSF efficiently removed arsenic up to 99.99% with long-term stability. The GSF provides 800 liters of arsenic-free drinking water in 39 hours with a rate of 2.5 L/h. A tentative me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An As removal technique called Gravel Sand Filter (GSF) is being utilized in Kyaunggon Township, Ayeyarwady region, which is located in one of the most intensely contaminated regions (Phyu et al, 2020). The GSF technology for removing As at the household level is inexpensive, efficient, and suitable for long-term use in developing countries (Abbas et al, 2018). Alternatively, absorption and BTU (Bucket Treatment Unit) are the most appropriate, acceptable, and sustainable methods for countries, such as Myanmar, which are limited in terms of technology, political, and financial situations.…”
Section: Remediation and Mitigation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An As removal technique called Gravel Sand Filter (GSF) is being utilized in Kyaunggon Township, Ayeyarwady region, which is located in one of the most intensely contaminated regions (Phyu et al, 2020). The GSF technology for removing As at the household level is inexpensive, efficient, and suitable for long-term use in developing countries (Abbas et al, 2018). Alternatively, absorption and BTU (Bucket Treatment Unit) are the most appropriate, acceptable, and sustainable methods for countries, such as Myanmar, which are limited in terms of technology, political, and financial situations.…”
Section: Remediation and Mitigation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Realistically, it is now recognized that at least 140 million people in more than 50 countries have been exposed to water containing As. Particularly affected are countries such as Bangladesh, India, China, and Iran (Abbas et al, 2018; Shafiquzzaman et al, 2023; Shaji et al, 2021) where human exposure to As compounds occurs through drinking contaminated water (Biswas et al, 2023), consuming contaminated food (Y. Guo et al, 2023), engaging in industrial processes, participating in agricultural activities, smoking cigarettes, and experiencing carcinogenic events resulting from this exposure (Chaudhary et al, 2021). Thus, exposure to As‐contaminated water has occurred, for example, through ingestion or consumption as drinking water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Bangladesh, arsenic contamination of tube well waters, which serves as the primary source of drinking water, has long been recognized as a serious public health issue [24,25]. For example, in the Punjab province of Pakistan over 20% of the total population are exposed to As pollution and there are many areas, i.e., Muzaffargarh [26], Rahim Yar Khan [27,28], Vehari [29], Mailsi [30], Bahawalpur [31], Lahore and adjacent areas [32] and Multan [33] in both the lower and upper Punjab, where As is much higher than the recommended WHO value [34]. Since the extent of this As-contamination issue is likely to extend well beyond the boundaries of the Punjab, there is an urgent need to analyze As concentrations in adjacent areas and assess the consequential possible human health risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%