2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of direct-formed square and rectangular hollow section stub columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1), nearly the same steps are followed in all facilities. The immersion time for individual parts of a truss is strictly controlled (approximately five minutes for each connection) to produce the best coating quality [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. For cold-formed hollow structural section (HSS), similar to the heat treatment (also at 450°C) per ASTM A1085 Supplement S1 [11], or the Class H finish per CSA G40.20/G40.21 [12], the galvanizing temperature has little effect on the material strength and ductility as a higher temperature is needed to produce metallurgical changes.…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1), nearly the same steps are followed in all facilities. The immersion time for individual parts of a truss is strictly controlled (approximately five minutes for each connection) to produce the best coating quality [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. For cold-formed hollow structural section (HSS), similar to the heat treatment (also at 450°C) per ASTM A1085 Supplement S1 [11], or the Class H finish per CSA G40.20/G40.21 [12], the galvanizing temperature has little effect on the material strength and ductility as a higher temperature is needed to produce metallurgical changes.…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cold-formed hollow structural section (HSS), similar to the heat treatment (also at 450°C) per ASTM A1085 Supplement S1 [11], or the Class H finish per CSA G40.20/G40.21 [12], the galvanizing temperature has little effect on the material strength and ductility as a higher temperature is needed to produce metallurgical changes. However, this process inevitably changes the residual stress magnitudes and distributions in cold-formed HSS members [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. To facilitate the application of galvanized high-strength HSS in infrastructure projects, recent research [2,[6][7][8][9][10] showed that, for commonly specified crosssectional sizes, similar to the heat treatment per ASTM A1085 [11] and CSA G40.20/G40.21 [12], hot-dip galvanizing can improve member behaviours under axial compressive and flexural loads through effective partial residual stress relief.…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Theofanous and Gardner [53] found that the EC3 effective width equation and Class 3 slenderness limit for stub and long stainless steel SHS columns are conservative. Kamran and Min [54] witnessed AISC360-16, CSA S16-19, and AISI S100-16 to be safe for SHS/RHS cold-formed stub columns. Liu et al [55] discovered that Class 1~4 slenderness limits in EC-3 and ANSI/ AISC 360-16 for Q355 and Q460 mild steel columns are non-conservative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%