2001
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-381x(2001)15:2(103)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Cazenovia Creek Ice Control Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Cazenovia Creek ICS has 12-ft gaps between vertical cylindrical piers that protrude 3 ft above the adjacent floodplain elevation. Based on model tests, it can retain ice at discharges approaching the 100-year flow, depending on ice thickness, although minor washouts of ice through the gaps begin to become significant at about half of this discharge (Lever et al 2001(Lever et al , 2003. At present, model tests are the most reliable way to quantify the ice-holding capacity of a given ICS design.…”
Section: Ics Ice-holding Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Cazenovia Creek ICS has 12-ft gaps between vertical cylindrical piers that protrude 3 ft above the adjacent floodplain elevation. Based on model tests, it can retain ice at discharges approaching the 100-year flow, depending on ice thickness, although minor washouts of ice through the gaps begin to become significant at about half of this discharge (Lever et al 2001(Lever et al , 2003. At present, model tests are the most reliable way to quantify the ice-holding capacity of a given ICS design.…”
Section: Ics Ice-holding Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ICSs designed for Hardwick, Vermont, and Cazenovia Creek, New York, are examples ( Fig. 1; Lever et al 1997Lever et al , 2001. As the name implies, these structures consist of boulders or concrete piers spaced across the main river channel to retain ice arriving from upstream.…”
Section: Pier Ics With Floodplain Relief Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The percentage of the ice volume lost depends largely on the characteristics of the specific reach. Earlier estimates ranged from 20% to 80% (Lever et al 2000). Losses of 50% were used for this relatively small reach because the discharge is largely contained within the channel at breakup flows.…”
Section: Estimation Of Ice Volumementioning
confidence: 99%