2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of carbohydrate multiarrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to template-encoded nucleic acid and protein sequences which aid function assignments, the need for a more empirical, high throughput analysis of potential carbohydrate binding partners has resulted in a variety of approaches for the generation of carbohydrate microarrays [2][3][4][5][6]. For reasons of sensitivity, throughput and compatibility with existing nucleic acid array hardware, fluorescence based measurements is, to date, the prevalent detection principle for such microarrays.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast to template-encoded nucleic acid and protein sequences which aid function assignments, the need for a more empirical, high throughput analysis of potential carbohydrate binding partners has resulted in a variety of approaches for the generation of carbohydrate microarrays [2][3][4][5][6]. For reasons of sensitivity, throughput and compatibility with existing nucleic acid array hardware, fluorescence based measurements is, to date, the prevalent detection principle for such microarrays.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, it was reported that an ordinary microarray scanner can collect signals in a scope from the substrate surface to a height of more than 20 µm, so the particles with the size between tens and several hundred of nanometers should be suitable for the microarray analysis. 8,32 The fluorescence image (Figure 7) scanned by a confocal microarray scanner was an early test to use the carbohydrate affinity particles in this field. Though this analysis gave some meaningful results, presently, it still lacked reliability and accuracy comparing with the former protein binding experiment.…”
Section: 62mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, the strategies for coating the carbohydrates onto a certain solid support can be classified into three categories: 8,9 physical adsorption, streptavidin/biotin immobilization, and chemical attachment. Nitrocellulose and black polystyrene films were commonly used for non-covalent adsorption of the polysaccharides and glycoproteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although analytes can be detected by a wide range of immobilized ligands, such as antibodies (Soh et al, 2003;Liu et al, 2004;Choi et al, 2005;Muller-Renaud et al, 2005), enzymes, and carbohydrate-binding proteins (CBPs) (Hsieh et al, 2004), the development of carbohydrate-based biosensors has recently received increased attention because of the importance of carbohydrate-protein interactions in life. So far, carbohydratebased biosensors are predominantly used for the characterization of the kinetics and affinity of carbohydrate-protein interactions (Shinohara et al, 1994;Bourne et al, 2002;Zhang et al, 2006), or in an array-type set-up (Love and Seeberger, 2002;Feizi et al, 2003;Blixt et al, 2004;Dyukova et al, 2006) to determine the specificity, and possible cross-reactivity of a CBP. However, it would also be of interest to apply carbohydrate-based biosensors to the sensitive detection and quantification of minute amounts of CBPs, which could lead to the development of diagnostic tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%