2014 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ieecon.2014.6925875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of approximate 2DOF digital controller for interleaved PFC boost converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with pole configuration [20], PID control, sliding mode control, optimal control, robust control is more adaptable and practical when the system has parameter uncertainty, robust control has therefore attracted widespread attention in the design of power electronic device controllers [17], [21], [22]. PID control is simple and effective, but it is very difficult to find the appropriate control coefficient value for a complex topology like NMDC [23]. Sliding mode control is highly robust, however, the chattering problem in sliding mode control is difficult to eliminate [24].…”
Section: Robust Controller Design Of Nmdcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with pole configuration [20], PID control, sliding mode control, optimal control, robust control is more adaptable and practical when the system has parameter uncertainty, robust control has therefore attracted widespread attention in the design of power electronic device controllers [17], [21], [22]. PID control is simple and effective, but it is very difficult to find the appropriate control coefficient value for a complex topology like NMDC [23]. Sliding mode control is highly robust, however, the chattering problem in sliding mode control is difficult to eliminate [24].…”
Section: Robust Controller Design Of Nmdcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupled with 80 linear matrix inequalities that satisfy the performance robustness of convex polyhedron, the entire optimization is composed of 208 linear matrix inequalities, that is, the robust control of NMDC is to find the minimum γ and the corresponding matrices W and Y that can satisfy 208 linear matrix inequalities. Calculated by MATLAB LMI toolbox, we get γ = 49.1089, and the corresponding feedback gain is show in (23). The input voltage at the beginning of the simulation is 60V, jumps to 80V at 1.5ms, and 60V at 2.5ms for robust control.…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%