Design of Anomaly Detection and Visualization Tool for IoT Blockchain

Song, Jinha; Nang, Jongho; Jang, Ji-Woong

doi:10.1109/csci46756.2018.00292

Cited by 12 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When it comes to consensus mechanism, public blockchains tend to align with proof of stake (PoS) and proof of work (PoW), with public blockchain improving trust overall owing to the public distribution of data in the network [61], meaning the modification of data is almost impossible, as is application protection from developers [23][24][25]. is provides various benefits with low costs, with Bitcoin providing savings when contrasted alongside central party-dependent systems [26]. Nonetheless, there are a number of drawbacks to this type of blockchain, specifically when it comes to the system's computational power [60][61][62].…”

Section: Public Blockchainsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Private blockchains are created and managed by particular businesses when it comes to their requirements and may be recognised as an additional layer of security that achieves access abilities by facilitating particular actions by different identifiable members [24][25][26]. is particular form of blockchain is not as widely utilised as the public one, although it is the preference when it comes to individuals in need of privacy, security, and a particular identity system [25].…”

Section: Private Blockchainsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, when it comes to decentralisation, private blockchains are only partly decentralised, owing to the fact that public access is limited [26,27]. Business-to-business virtual currency exchange, such as that of Ripple, as an example, is a private blockchain, which may be recognised as an umbrella project of open-source blockchain applications [64,65].…”

Section: Private Blockchainsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…e consortium blockchain is seen to be partially decentralised and recognised as a middleground between private [23] and public blockchain [26], bringing together the advantages of both, although consortium blockchain may be recognised at the consensus level [65][66][67]. Essentially, this system is not so open that blocks can be published and validated by anyone [25], nor can blockchain procedures only be appointed by one individual [66,67].…”

Section: Consortium Blockchainsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Essentially, this system is not so open that blocks can be published and validated by anyone [25], nor can blockchain procedures only be appointed by one individual [66,67]. Generally speaking, consortium blockchains are defined as permissioned blockchains that are overseen by a number of different entities, which therefore benefit from a greater degree of decentralisation when compared against private blockchains [67], as well as more security [24][25][26][27]. Nonetheless, the process of establishing consortiums can be difficult owing to the need to have cooperation between different entities [27], which therefore means a number of different challenges, in addition to possible risks when it comes to trust and security [26].…”

Section: Consortium Blockchainsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The Blockchain Framework for the Sharing of Data between Training Providers Based on the Internet of Things

Alotaibi¹

2022

Scientific Programming

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Blockchain technology is recognised as being a key focus when it comes to modern-day studies and interest on a global scale, with the new block of transactions responsible for the continued growth and expansion of a distributed ledger that details transactional data, complete with immutable and verifiable structures. A greater degree of transparency, privacy, security, and traceability is provided by blockchain when a comparison is drawn with more conventional strategies. As a result of its secure and more progressive elements, blockchain is applied in a number of different arenas, including digital transactions, education, the healthcare industry, the Internet of Things (IoT), trade finance, and the training sector. Importantly, a notable effect on all applied fields has been witnessed as a result of blockchain technology, with data and transactional reliability, as well as privacy, recognised as the most important aspects when it comes to data-sharing in the training arena specifically. Very few models and frameworks are aligned with the guidelines put forth in this sector; as such, this report seeks to consider the pressing need to determine a model and framework to facilitate the sharing of data between training providers in line with the IoT. This study, therefore, centres on the creation of a blockchain model, with the creation of a sole recognition system for professionals seen to be advantageous for all such providers, specifically in the mind of providing a greater degree of clarity and simplification to the system in line with the IoT. The suggested model is focused on a number of different elements that have been identified as a result of studied theories, with consideration of the three different standpoints and professional assessments of 16 unique items.

show abstract