2007 Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference 2007
DOI: 10.1109/apmc.2007.4554736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of an X-band Oscillator Using Novel Miniaturized Microstrip Hairpin Resonator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated FOM is approximately of À180 dBc/ Hz with dissipated power of 147 mW. The phase noise and the output power of the microwave oscillator using different microstrip resonators like spurline resonator, spiral resonator, planar helical resonator are compared and tabulated as in Table 1 [9][10][11][12]. Among those recently published articles, the microwave oscillator using the new proposed planar resonator exhibited better phase noise characteristics with output power at the similar frequency regime.…”
Section: Experimental Results Of Microwave Oscillatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated FOM is approximately of À180 dBc/ Hz with dissipated power of 147 mW. The phase noise and the output power of the microwave oscillator using different microstrip resonators like spurline resonator, spiral resonator, planar helical resonator are compared and tabulated as in Table 1 [9][10][11][12]. Among those recently published articles, the microwave oscillator using the new proposed planar resonator exhibited better phase noise characteristics with output power at the similar frequency regime.…”
Section: Experimental Results Of Microwave Oscillatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of FoM found to be better due to it possessing greater capacitive and inductive coupling effects; these coupling effects also lead to its higher Q value. The main parameters of the microwave oscillators are its phase noise and output power at the given frequency, therefore, these parameters are compared to other recently published literatures [8–13], which are tabulated in Table 1. This work showed better performance among those studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…또한, 유전체 공진기는 발진기에 적용 시 마이 크로스트립 라인(microstrip line)에 커플링하고 이를 능동 회로와 결합시키게 되는데, 이때 평판형 회로 가 구현된 기판에 유전체 공진기를 정확한 위치에 고정하기 힘들고, 추가적인 조립 공정을 요구하기 때문에 회로 집적에 불리한 점이 있다. 마이크로스 트립 공진기나 SIW(Substrate Integrated Waveguide) 구조를 갖는 공진기를 이용한 발진기의 경우 [4], [5] , 집 적 면에서 유리한 점이 있으나 여전히 위상 잡음 특 성은 탁월하지 않으며, 크기 면에서도 상당 부분 개 선된 바 없다.…”
Section: ⅰ 서 론unclassified