2015
DOI: 10.1111/idj.12131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of an innovative paediatric capitation payment approach for public sector dentistry: an Australian experience

Abstract: This model offered an early entry point for paediatric patients to access dental care that addressed their needs, whilst being flexible enough to be fiscally attractive.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Atchison and Schoen’s (1990) study shows that fee-for-service payment is the preferred option by the private practitioner, rather than capitation payments [ 23 ]. The consumer’s perspective as presented by Andås and Hakeberg (2014), stated that their preference is the capped prepayment fee [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Atchison and Schoen’s (1990) study shows that fee-for-service payment is the preferred option by the private practitioner, rather than capitation payments [ 23 ]. The consumer’s perspective as presented by Andås and Hakeberg (2014), stated that their preference is the capped prepayment fee [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be argued that capitation had an advantage, as the payment price was discounted by 65% and there was not a payment increase during the study. The reason for the discount was based on a previous paediatric capitation study that also utilised oral health therapy students to provide the care and that they cost less than dentists [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…patient expectations, and perceptions around the professional role of dentists) affecting the delivery of caries prevention in general ( Templeton et al, 2016 ). Business pressure means the cost-effectiveness of different remuneration models for FV application is likely to be of continued interest ( Birch, 2015 ) because this affects aspects of the model such as time, space and staff resources ( Brocklehurst et al, 2013b , Conquest et al, 2015 ). We have reported that, in terms of evidence-based practice, practitioner beliefs about effectiveness ( Elouafkaoui et al, 2015 ), clinical judgement relating to need, and patient preferences, seem to be somewhat stronger drivers than the available research evidence on its own ( Vander Schaaf et al ) How to best extend duties across the dental team is known to be a somewhat intractable problem ( Brocklehurst et al, 2013a ), but interesting research is seeking to understand how best to utilise the team to increase efficiency and lower costs ( Brocklehurst et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is thought that in a public system where dentists are salaried this is less likely to be an issue, the introduction of incentives and targets can be the driving force to performing more services without having a positive impact on oral health quality (O'Reilly et al, 2012). While previous Australian studies have compared and contrasted the use of CF and FFS payment schemes, dental care in these schemes is always partly funded by the patient (Conquest et al, 2015(Conquest et al, , 2017(Conquest et al, , 2021. In contrast, dental treatment as part of the work-up for HNC management at FSH or OHCWA is not self-funded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%