Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.01.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of an elastic porous injectable biomaterial for tissue regeneration and volume retention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to this novel finding, previous injectable fillers have not maintained augmentation beyond material degradation 13,26,27 . Additionally, biomaterial scaffolds designed to promote tissue bulking have done so by creating intentional collagen-1 deposition and fibrosis 10,11,26 .…”
Section: Characterization Of Tissue De Novo Formation In Map-treated ...contrasting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to this novel finding, previous injectable fillers have not maintained augmentation beyond material degradation 13,26,27 . Additionally, biomaterial scaffolds designed to promote tissue bulking have done so by creating intentional collagen-1 deposition and fibrosis 10,11,26 .…”
Section: Characterization Of Tissue De Novo Formation In Map-treated ...contrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Tissue bulking is desired in many clinical applications where a deficit of patient tissue inhibits normal function, including glottic insufficiency, the specific focus of this study 13,33 . The ideal biomaterial approach would be a resorbable scaffold capable of promoting permanent de novo tissue formation that extends beyond the material lifetime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, not only clinicians’ but especially patients’ preference for fewer invasive and expensive procedures has undoubtedly promoted their use [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. An injectable formulation for soft tissues reconstruction currently relies on two main approaches, involving autologous tissue displacement (e.g., lipofilling, platelet-rich plasma) or biomaterials-based filling [ 5 ]. Both approaches have some advantages and drawbacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the VF is paralyzed or the vibration is weakened, the ECM in the lamina propria (LP) may develop disuse atrophy, i.e., degradation of the innate ECM of the VFs. Hence, in addition to catering for the fundamental requirements such as injectability, biocompatibility and volume stability, the desired material for injection laryngoplasty should also be capable to enhance the synthesis of ECM in the VFs, which is a major hurdle clinically [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%